Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

202P - Molecular kaleidoscope of EGFR mutant NSCLC: Be as precise as possible

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ullas Batra

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S149-S153.
<article-id>elcc_Ch10

Authors

U. Batra1, M. Sharma2, A. B P3, S. Vaidya3, S. Pasricha3, A. Mehta3

Author affiliations

  • 1 New Delhi/IN
  • 2 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, 110085 - New Delhi/IN
  • 3 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 202P

Background

EGFR mutant NSCLC has shown remarkable response since the approval of osimertinib in the first-line. However, despite initial response, many patients do not show sustained clinical benefit. This is attributed to other intrinsic mechanisms owing to concurrently occurring genomic alterations along with EGFR, both clonal and/or subclonal. This is one of the largest cohorts depicting the effect of these mutations on TKI treatment.

Methods

192 patients of advanced EGFR mutant NSCLC treated with first-line EGFR TKI were included. Next generation sequencing was performed on the diagnostic tumor blocks using a customized lung panel comprising 34 genes. Clinical and genomic features were correlated with outcomes like PFS, OS and objective response rates.

Results

Of the 192 patients included, at least 1 additional genomic alteration was encountered in 91 cases (47.6%). Median number of additional mutations was 2 per patient. EGFR exon 19 mutations were more commonly associated with concurrent alterations when compared to the L858R group (68.6% vs 41.1%, p = 0.05). Uncommon EGFR subgroup showed no additional alterations. Most frequent co-mutation was in the TP53 gene seen in 91 (47.5%) cases, followed by PI3KCA in 41 (21.4%) cases. Other alterations seen included PTEN (9.8%), RB1 (7.2%), KRAS (6.9%), KDR (3.2%) mutations, and FGFR1 and MET amplification. Exon 19 subgroup showed a higher occurrence of PTEN and RB1, contrary to L858R which showed higher TP53 and PIK3CA alterations. Patients with co-occurring PIK3CA showed a shorter PFS (7.8 months vs. 11.3 months p < 0.05) and OS (23.4 months vs. 34.3 months, p = 0.06) after adjustment for use of osimertinib. Similar trend was seen with TP53 concurrent mutations (HR for PFS: 1.78 95%CI = 0.9–2.1). There was no significant correlation of survival measures with the mutant allele burden or type of TKI used.

Conclusions

EGFR mutations in NSCLC show a higher prevalence in this part of the world, and this study also proves that the heterogeneity and molecular landscape of this molecular subgroup is distinct from that of the West. Impact on survival outcomes warrants panel based NGS testing at baseline in all EGFR mutant cases in order to optimise sequencing of TKIs.

Legal entity responsible for the study

U. Batra.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.