Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

184P - INHA acts as a novel and potential biomarker in lung adenocarcinoma and shapes the immune-suppressive tumor microenvironment

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Bo Cheng

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S137-S148.
<article-id>elcc_Ch09

Authors

B. Cheng1, X. Zhang2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Jinan/CN
  • 2 Qilu hospital of Shandong University, Jinan/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 184P

Background

Immune-related subgroup classification in immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy is largely inconclusive in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD).

Methods

First, the single sample Gene set Enrichment Analysis (ssGSEA) algorithm and K-means algorithm were used to identify immune-based subtypes for LUAD cohort based on the immunogenomic profiling of 29 immune signatures from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database (n = 535). Second, we conducted a bioinformatics analysis on data to examine the prognostic and predictive value of immune-based subtypes. The survival analysis and further cox proportional hazards regression analysis were conducted in LUAD. Then, immune score, tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TIICs) and immune checkpoint expression of the three subtypes were analyzed respectively. In the end, GO and KEGG of the differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between 3 immune-based subtypes were analyzed for functional enrichment pathways.

Results

A total of 3 immune-based subtypes with different immune signatures were identified for LUAD. We identified three LUAD subtypes named cluster 1 (C1), cluster 2 (C2) and cluster 3 (C3). Patients in cluster 3 had higher stromal, immune, and ESTIMATE scores, while cluster 1 was the opposite. Cases in cluster 1 showed an enrichment of macrophages M0 and activation of dendritic cells, while in cluster 3 tumors were enriched in CD8+ T cell, activation of CD memory T cells and macrophages M1. Cluster 3 was characterized by greater immune cell infiltration, as well as better survival prognosis compared to the other subtypes. In addition, patients in cluster 3 had higher expression levels of immune checkpoint such as PD-L1, PD1, CTLA4, LAG3, IDO1 and HAVCR2. TMB scores of clusters showed no significantly statistical differences. Furthermore, we identified that immune-related pathways were enriched in cluster 3.

Conclusions

Based on this study, combined-biomarkers were identified to predict outcomes following immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment. Furthermore, our findings have enormous potential for assisting in the identification of immunological biomarkers and serving as a starting point for novel combination-based therapy strategies.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.