Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

156P - Development of a predictive model for early detection of lung cancer: SREAL-eLUNG study

Date

31 Mar 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Oscar Jose Juan Vidal

Citation

Journal of Thoracic Oncology (2023) 18 (4S): S121-S128.
<article-id>elcc_Ch07

Authors

O.J. Juan Vidal1, M.E. Gas Lopez2, C. López Gómez2, A. Loras Monfort2, J.L. Valles Pardo2, S. Palanca Suela3, N. Mancheño Franch3, E. Ansotegui3, V. Calvo Medina3, C. Muñoz Nuñez3, F.J. Celada Alvarez3, B. Martínez Sanchís3, S. Marset García3, J. Castejón Esteban3, C. Cano Cerviño3, J. Medina Alvarez3, G. Garcia Rubia4, Á. Callejo Mellén5, B. Valdivieso Martínez2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Valencia/ES
  • 2 Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe de Valencia, Valencia/ES
  • 3 Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia/ES
  • 4 AstraZeneca FarmacéuticaSpain, Madrid/ES
  • 5 AstraZeneca Farmaceutica Spain S A, Madrid/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 156P

Background

Lung Cancer (LC) diagnosis is highly complex due to non-specific initial symptoms and lack of routine screening. Machine Learning (ML) based cancer risk-assessment tools can ease earlier diagnosis by enhancing referrals for cancer investigations. We present an age and sex matched case-control study aimed at the development of a ML predictive model to identify individuals at high risk of LC, estimating a potential decrease of death risk by 10% per anticipated month.

Methods

Electronic Health Records from a digital cohort of 4332 citizens (722 LC cases & 3610 controls) ≥18 years old having a pathology-confirmed LC and assigned to the Department of Health Valencia La Fe were analysed to identify early risk factors. Initial variable selection was based on structured and semi-structured information, related to laboratory tests, cancer history, use of health-care resources, symptoms and smoking history. The final selection of variables and prediction time was determined by feature selection methods, clinical suitability of predictions and model performance. Four ML classifiers were used (table). The dataset was randomly split into a training (70%) and a test (30%) set. Fivefold cross-validation was used for model selection with the final performance evaluated on the unseen test set.

Table: 156P

Performances of ML classifiers on test set

ClassifierAUCSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)
Logistic Regression0.7977.968.6
Decision Tree0.7777.968.1
Random Forest0.8079.368.3
Neural Network0.798068.3

Results

Using just nine input variables within 60 days prior to diagnosis [ALT, GPT and creatinine levels, platelets, lymphocytes and monocytes counts, smoking status, general malaise, prior emphysema history and number of outpatient visits in the previous year], all techniques displayed similar performances with areas under curves (AUCs).

Conclusions

The developed models could help to identify a greater number of patients for either initiate the diagnostic process or to establish a close monitoring at primary care level with a potential decrease of patients’ death risk by around 20%. However, additional clinical validation of models’ performance will be imperative to gauge usefulness in a real-world scenario.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca Farmacéutica Spain.

Funding

AstraZeneca Farmacéutica Spain, S.A.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.