Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

731P - The impact of proton pump inhibitors on pazopanib exposure

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Genitourinary Cancers

Presenters

Stefanie Krens

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

S.D. Krens1, F. Lubberman2, M. Van Egmond1, F. jansman3, D. Burger1, P. Hamberg4, W. Vervenne5, H. Gelderblom6, I.M.E. Desar7, C. Van Herpen7, N. Van Erp1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Pharmacy, Radboudumc, 6525 GA - Nijmegen/NL
  • 2 Department Of Pharmacy, Gelderland Valley Hospital, 6716 - EDE/NL
  • 3 Department Of Clinical Pharmacy, Deventer Hospital, 7416 SE - Deventer/NL
  • 4 Department Of Medical Oncology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam/NL
  • 5 Department Of Medical Oncology, Deventer Hospital, 7416 SE - Deventer/NL
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center (LUMC), 2333 ZA - Leiden/NL
  • 7 Department Of Medical Oncology, Radboudumc, 6525 GA - Njimegen/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 731P

Background

For pazopanib (PZ), a target trough concentration (Cmin) of PZ above 20.5 mg/L has been associated with improved clinical efficacy. Absorption of PZ is pH-dependent and concomitant therapy with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reduces its exposure by ∼40%. However, since PPIs do not elevate intragastric pH over the full 24-hour range, staggered dosing of the PPI one hour after intake of PZ is proposed as strategy to overcome this interaction. To evaluate the effect of this strategy clinically, we investigated the influence of staggered dosing of PPIs on PZ exposure.

Methods

From patients treated with PZ 800 mg OD (taken fasted) between March 2013 and March 2020, the first measured PZ Cmin levels at steady state were collected. The concomitant use of PPIs was extracted from the electronic medical records. All patients were instructed to take the PPI one hour after intake of PZ. Geometric mean (GM) PZ Cmin levels were compared between the groups of patients who were treated with and without a PPI. Additionally, the effect of the type of PPIs on PZ exposure was explored.

Results

Of the 132 patients treated with PZ, 50 patients were treated with PPI. The GM PZ Cmin was 24.1 mg/L (95% CI 21.3-27.3) in the patients who were treated with PPI compared to 28.2 mg/L (95% CI 25.9-30.5)(p= .033) in those without PPI. In patients treated with PPI, 32% had a Cmin below the target threshold compared to 21% of the patients without PPI. Sub-analysis showed that the reduced PZ exposure was mainly observed in patients who were co-treated with omeprazole (n=26) (GM Cmin 22.8 mg/L (95% CI 18.8-27.6) (p=.038), while minimal reduction in PZ exposure was observed in those treated with pantoprazole (n=19) (GM Cmin 26.6 mg/L (95% CI 22.0-32.2) compared to patients without PPI.

Conclusions

Despite staggered dosing of PZ and PPIs, concomitant treatment still resulted in reduced PZ exposure. Therefore, we conclude that the staggered dosing of PPIs did not mitigate the effect PPIs have on PZ exposure. Within the PPI group, a more pronounced decrease in PZ exposure was observed for omeprazole compared to pantoprazole. Hence, for patients unable to stop PPIs during PZ treatment, pantoprazole might be preferred over omeprazole. Furthermore, PZ Cmin should be monitored to prevent subtherapeutic exposure.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Radboudumc.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

F. jansman: Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Advisory board: Servier. D. Burger: Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Janssen; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): ViiV Heatlhcare; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Gilead; Honoraria (institution): AbbVie. C. Van Herpen: Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck Sharp and Dohme; Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ipsen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (self): Novartis. N. Van Erp: Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Research grant/Funding (institution): Astellas; Research grant/Funding (institution): Janssen-Cilag; Research grant/Funding (institution): Gilead; Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ipsen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.