Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

465P - Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis identifies potential prognostic and predictive biomarker in patients (pts) with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) treated with regorafenib in the phase III CORRECT trial

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Francesca Battaglin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S409-S461. 10.1016/annonc/annonc270

Authors

F. Battaglin1, W. Zhang1, A. Skubala2, H. Arai1, J. Wang1, S. Soni1, Y.A. Wang3, K. Köchert4, A. Schulz4, M. Teufel3, J. Millstein5, H.J. Lenz1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, USC - Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 90033 - Los Angeles/US
  • 2 Data Science, Chrestos Concept GmbH & Co. KG, - - Essen/DE
  • 3 Oncology Biomarker Strategy, Bayer HealthCare Pharmaceuticals, - - Whippany/US
  • 4 Pharmaceuticals Division, Bayer AG, - - Berlin/DE
  • 5 Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, USC - Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 90033 - Los Angeles/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 465P

Background

The CORRECT trial showed an overall survival (OS) benefit for regorafenib in mCRC pts who progressed after standard therapies. No predictive biomarker exists for regorafenib and treatment is often burdened by severe toxicity. We investigated the prognostic and predictive value of genetic variants selected based on previous associations with antiangiogenic treatment.

Methods

Genomic DNA from 507 pts (337 regorafenib, 170 placebo) was genotyped using a customized OncoArray (Illumina). 149 candidate SNPs representing 78 genes and 15 pathways were identified. Stratified multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression was used to jointly assess the predictive and prognostic effects, using a 2-df likelihood ratio test of the SNP effect and SNP*treatment interaction. SNPs were coded additively. False discovery rate (FDR) was controlled at Q = 0.1.

Results

A functional SNP, rs1056560, in the CRY1 gene in the clock pathway was significantly associated with OS (P < .001, Q = .06). Both prognostic and predictive effects (marginal SNP effect and SNP*treatment interaction) achieved nominal significance (P = .04 and P < .001, respectively). Significant OS benefit was found for pts with rs1056560 C allele variant treated with regorafenib: 6.5 vs 3.3 months with placebo for CC genotype carriers (N = 93, HR 0.48, 95%CI 0.30-0.78, P = .003) and 6.9 vs 5.4 months for CA genotype (N = 221, HR 0.62, 95%CI 0.45-0.85, P = .003). No treatment benefit was observed for the AA genotype (N = 174). No SNP achieved FDR significance for progression free survival, however, CRY1 rs1056560 was nominally significant for the 2-df test (P = .01) and the predictive effect (P = .007).

Conclusions

For the first time we identify a potential predictive biomarker for regorafenib in the CORRECT population. CRY1 is a negative regulator of the clock machinery, which modulates the circadian expression of key target genes, including VEGF. Growing interest is focusing on alterations of this pathway in cancer. Our finding helps better understand regorafenib response and may support alternative treatment choices based on CRY1 rs1056560 genotypes to optimize regorafenib benefit.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01103323.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Bayer.

Funding

Bayer.

Disclosure

F. Battaglin: Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Caris Life Sciences. A. Skubala: Full/Part-time employment: Chrestos Concept GmbH & Co. KG; Full/Part-time employment: Bayer. Y.A. Wang, K. Köchert, A. Schulz: Full/Part-time employment: Bayer. M. Teufel: Full/Part-time employment: Bayer; Full/Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. H.J. Lenz: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck Serono; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bayer; Advisory/Consultancy: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: GlaxoSmithKline; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self): Isofol Medica. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.