Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1186P - Impact of temozolomide (TEM) and capecitabine (CAP) dose reductions in toxicity and efficacy in patients (pts) with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) treated with CAPTEM chemotherapy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Neuroendocrine Neoplasms

Presenters

Jorge Hernando

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S711-S724. 10.1016/annonc/annonc281

Authors

J. Hernando1, A. Garcia-Alvarez1, D.H. Marmolejo Castaneda1, D.A. Acosta Eyzaguirre1, M. Diez Garcia1, N. Saoudi Gonzalez1, A. Casteras2, M. Simo3, A. Garcia Burillo3, X. Merino4, L. Blanco5, J.L. Sanchez5, M. Roca6, J. Capdevila6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Endocrinology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 3 Nuclear Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 4 Radiology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 5 General Surgery Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 8035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 6 Medical Oncology Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 - Barcelona/ES

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1186P

Background

The combination of CAP and TEM (CAPTEM) is a regimen with significant activity in pts with NENs. Although efficacy data has been reported, hematological and gastrointestinal toxicity could reduce compliance with the treatment, especially at standard doses of CAP (750mg/m2 bid) and especially TEM (200mg/m2 day). The aim of this retrospective study is to review safety, toxicity and efficacy in daily routine practice in patients with NENs.

Methods

All patients with NENs treated with the CAPTEM regimen in our institution between 2015 and 2020 were reviewed. Data related to safety, efficacy, and compliance were recorded.

Results

32 pts received CAPTEM (age 62, 56% female). The primary site was pancreas (46.9%), lung (15.6%), and unknown origin (12.5%). 90.6% were well-differentiated tumors (56.3% NET G1-G2 and 34.3% NET G3). The daily practice population was well represented, including 43% of pts with significant comorbidities and 28.1% of pts with ECOG 2. Most pts received CAPTEM beyond the second line (68.8%). Preferred dose for starting the CAPTEM regime was CAP 750mg/m2 bid (59.4%) or 1000mg/m2 bid (34.4%); and TEM 150mg/m2 (75%). For the whole cohort, response rate (RR) was 34.4%, progression-free survival (PFS) 10.4 months (m), and Overall survival 16.4m. RR was higher in pancreatic tumors compared with extrapancreatic (53.3 vs 17.6%, p0.03). The main condition related with a worse PFS was ECOG 2 vs 0-1 (3.7 vs 10.8 m, p 0.015) Most common grade 1-2 toxicities were Nausea/Vomiting (53.1%), fatigue (50%), anemia (25%), oral mucositis (18.7%) and thrombocytopenia (12.5%). Grade 3-4 toxicity was related to Thrombocytopenia (9.3%), diarrhea (9.3%), and neutropenia (9.3%). Dose reduction was needed in 34.4% of cases and 15.6% of pts withdrawal due to toxicity, mainly related to hematological G3 and vomiting G2.

Conclusions

Lower doses of TMZ in the CAPTEM combination in NENs could reduce toxicity to improve compliance and efficacy, especially in ECOG 2 patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Vall d´Hebron Insitute of Oncology (VHIO).

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

J. Hernando: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Eisai; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Ipsen; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Novartis; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AAA; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Angelini. J. Capdevila: Honoraria (self): Novartis; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Honoraria (self): Exelixis; Honoraria (self): Bayer; Honoraria (self): Eisai; Honoraria (self): AAA; Honoraria (self): Amgen; Honoraria (self): Sanofi; Honoraria (self): Merck. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.