Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

214P - Impact of chemotherapy and hormonotherapy on acute skin toxicity of hypofractionated breast cancer radiotherapy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Raouia Ben Amor

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S303-S339. 10.1016/annonc/annonc267

Authors

R. Ben Amor1, M. Bohli1, H. Jaffel1, Y. Berrazega2, J. Yahyaoui3, A. Hamdoun3, L. Kochbati3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Radiation Oncology, Abderrahman Mami Hospital, 2080 - Ariana/TN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, Hopital Abderrahmane Mami de Pneumophistiologie, 2080 - Ariana/TN
  • 3 Radiation Oncology, Hopital Abderrahmen Mami de Pneumo-Phistiologie, 2080 - Ariana/TN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 214P

Background

We aimed to evaluate the effect of chemotherapy (CT) and hormonal therapy (HT) on the acute toxicity of a hypofractionated radiotherapy (RT) schedule after breast conserving surgery.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 141 breast cancer patients treated with 3D-CRT from December 2017 to February 2020 with an hypofractionnated regimen (40.05 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast followed by 13.35 Gy in 5 fractions to tumor bed). The median age was 53, range [25-82]. Molecular profile was: luminal A (28.4%), luminal B (58.9%), HER2-enriched (2.1%) and triple negative (10.6%). CT was given in 79,4 % of patients (n=112) and HT in 86.5% (n= 122). All patients were monitored for acute skin toxicity during RT according to CTCAE 4.0 (common toxicity criteria for adverse events) scale. The correlation of the incidence of toxicity grading with either the administration of CT or HT was performed with the χ2 test.

Results

Overall, there was no erythema in 6.4 % (n=9), grade 1 erythema in 64.5% (n=91), grade 2 in 26.2% (n=37) and grade 3 in 2.8% (n= 3). No grade 4 erythema was seen. No significant correlation was found between toxicity grading and CT [P= 0.34]. Skin toxicity Grade 2-3 in patient undergone CT or not was 76.2% versus 23.8% respectively. In the subset of patient receiving adjuvant CT (n=99), a significantly higher acute skin toxicity grade 2-3 was observed when the delay between CT and RT was less than 20 days (78.6 % versus 21.4% [P < 0.05]). There was no significant difference between grade 2-3 skin toxicity in patients taking or not hormonal therapy [P=0.7]. Grade 2-3 erythema was significantly higher in subgroup patients taking Letrozole compared to Anastrozole, 42.5% vs 12.5 % respectively [P=0.01].

Conclusions

Our results confirmed that hypofractionated breast radiation was a well-tolerated treatment (3% of grade 3 erythema). Neither CT nor HT have an impact on acute skin toxicity. CT to RT delay shorter than 20 days was significantly associated with higher graded (≥ Grade 2) skin toxicity.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Lotfi Kochbati.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.