Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1426P - Gender differences in treatment characteristics and outcomes of esophagogastric cancer surgery - Data from the Dutch upper-GI cancer audit

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Marianne Kalff

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S841-S873. 10.1016/annonc/annonc284

Authors

M.C. Kalff1, A.D. Wagner2, R.H. Verhoeven3, V.E.P.P. Lemmens3, H.W.M. van Laarhoven4, S.S. Gisbertz1, M.I. van Berge Henegouwen1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD - Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 Oncology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois - CHUV, 1011 - Lausanne/CH
  • 3 Research & Development, IKNL - Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation, 3501 DB - Utrecht/NL
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1100 DD - Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1426P

Background

Gender differences in clinicopathological characteristics and postoperative outcomes of curative esophagogastric cancer surgery are largely undefined. This study aimed to compare tumor and treatment characteristics and outcomes of esophagogastric cancer surgery between men and women in a national cohort.

Methods

Data was acquired from the Dutch Upper-GI Cancer Audit. Patients who underwent elective surgery for a primary esophagogastric squamous cell or adenocarcinoma between 2011-2015 were included. The primary endpoint, relative survival, i.e. adjusted for the normal life expectancy, was compared between men and women with esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), with subgroup analysis according to sub-location. Secondly, tumor and treatment characteristics and post-operative outcomes were compared.

Results

In total, 5617 patients were included, of which 72% were men. Similar cT- and cN-stages were observed, while lower (y)pT-stages were observed in women with ESCC and GAC ((y)pT3-tumors: 23% vs 27%, p 0.026; 37% vs 42%, p 0.014, respectively). In women, ESCC was located more proximally (mid esophagus 50% vs 39%, p<0.001) and antrum GAC was more frequent (47% vs 38%, p<0.001). In women with GAC, more poorly differentiated tumors (69% vs 57%, p<0.001) were observed. Men with GAC and EAC more often received neo-adjuvant treatment (91% vs 85%, p<0.001; 62% vs 56%, p 0.007, respectively), and men with GAC more adjuvant treatment (42% vs 37%, p 0.022). For GAC, more postoperative complications (38% vs 33%, p 0.017) and more reinterventions (16% vs 12%, p 0.008) were observed in men. No differences in 5-year relative survival for EAC, ESCC or GAC were observed. However, for corpus GAC a superior 5-year relative survival was observed in men (62% vs 48%, p 0.021).

Conclusions

In addition to gender differences in gastro-esophageal tumor location and differentiation, women with esophageal and gastric adenocarcinoma less frequently received neo-adjuvant therapy, although 5-year relative survival was comparable. For gastric corpus adenocarcinoma, an inferior survival was observed in women.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.