Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

848P - Features and clinical outcomes for younger women with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Emeline Colomba-Blameble

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S551-S589. 10.1016/annonc/annonc276

Authors

E. Colomba-Blameble1, P. Pautier2, J. Michels1, F. Pommeret3, M. Kfoury1, A. Maulard4, S. Gouy4, P. Morice4, C. Genestie5, A. Leary6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 2 Medecine, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 3 Département De Médecine Oncologique, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - VILLEJUIF/FR
  • 4 Oncology Surgery Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 5 Pathology Department, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 6 Gynecological Unit, Gustave Roussy Cancer Center, INSERM U981, and Groupe d'Investigateurs Nationaux pour l'Etude des Cancers Ovariens (GINECO), 94800 - Villejuif/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 848P

Background

Little is known about the unique features prognosis of young patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). We aimed to describe clinic-pathological features and survival in a population of patients aged <45 years treated in a single institution for EOC over a 30-year period.

Methods

We recovered the medical files of all the patients <45 years of age treated between 1990 and 2020 for EOC at the Gustave Roussy Cancer Center. Progression-free and overall survival distributions (PFS and OS), median follow-up, and the 95% CI were calculated using the reverse Kaplan–Meier method.

Results

Overall, 140 pts were included in the analysis. Concerning histology, only 26% (36/140) were HGSOC, the next most frequent histology was mucinous with 23.6% (33/140) pts. Other histologies included: endometrioid (16%), low grade serous (15%), clear cell (8.5%), Brenner tumour (3.5%), undifferentiated (3%), anaplastic (2%), mixed (9%);2% histology was not available (NA). Stage at diagnosis was I, II, III and IV in 49 (35%), 3 (2%), 74 (53%), 11 (8%) pts respectively; NA in 2.1%. Median age was 29.5 (13-45) years (yrs), 19 (13.5%) pts had a BRCA1 or 2 mutation. Among HGSOC the rate was 50% (19/36). In terms of treatment, most achieved complete debulking surgery (81%, 114/140). Among 85 pts with stage III-IV, 36 (43%) had inextirpable disease at diagnosis. With regards to survival and a median follow-up of 8.7 years (95%IC 0.1-34.4), median PFS was 3.9 (95%IC 2.9-6.2) yrs, median OS was not reached (95%IC 12.2-NR) in the whole population. In stage I-II, median PFS and OS was 22.7 (95% CI 20.1-26) and 23.1 yrs (16.5-29) respectively; In stage III-IV median PFS and OS was 27.5 ( 95% CI 17,4-37,6) and 97.6 months (95% CI 27-168,3) respectively. In HGSOC pts, 27 (75%) pts relapsed, and 16 (44%) were dead from disease. PFS and OS was 27.5 (95% CI 22.4-32.6) and 97.6 months (95 % CI 57.4-137.9) respectively.

Conclusions

Distribution of histology differs in younger EOC, with only 25% of HGSOC compared to 75% among older women, but is enriched for rare histologies. Among young pts with HGSOC, the rate of BRCA mutation was 50%. Good prognosis is driven by low stage in this cohort. Further molecular characterisation is on-going to explore the relation of age with established risk factor in pts treated for OC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Colomba-Blameble: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: GSK. P. Pautier: Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Eoche; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory/Consultancy: Genentech; Advisory/Consultancy: Clovis; Research grant/Funding (institution): PharmaMar. A. Leary: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Clovis; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: PharmaMar; Honoraria (institution), Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro; Advisory/Consultancy: Gammamabs; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Research grant/Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant/Funding (institution): Seattle genetics; Research grant/Funding (institution): Inivata; Research grant/Funding (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Merus; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.