Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1451P - Comparative response evaluation of cisplatin-capecitabine with cisplatin-5-fluorouracil in advanced gastric carcinoma: A quasi-experimental study

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Ariful Hoque

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S841-S873. 10.1016/annonc/annonc284

Authors

A. Hoque1, S. Alam2, M..A. Bari2, M..S.U. Matin1, R.K. Bhowmick3, A. Chowdhury1, I.U. Rahim4, A.K. Thakur5, T. Ahmed6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Radiotherapy, Dhaka Medical College Hospital, 1000 - Dhaka/BD
  • 2 Department Of Oncology, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka/BD
  • 3 Department Of Radiation Oncology, NICRH - National Institute of Cancer Research & Hospital, 1212 - Dhaka/BD
  • 4 Department Of Oncology, Square Hospital Ltd, 1205 - Dhaka/BD
  • 5 Department Of Oncology, Binaytara Foundation Cancer Center, Janakpur/NP
  • 6 Department Of Oncology, Khwaja Yunus Ali Medical College & Hospital, Sirajganj/BD

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1451P

Background

Chemotherapy is the mainstay of treatment for advanced inoperable/stage IV gastric carcinoma (AGC). Oral chemotherapy is becoming an increasingly popular treatment strategy for patients with AGC. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a cisplatin-capecitabine (XP) regimen with cisplatin-5-fluorouracil (FP) regimen in AGC.

Methods

A total of sixty-two patients (31 patients in each arm), who had biopsy-proven AGC with no history of previous treatment, were included. All patients received cisplatin (80 mg/m2 i.v. day 1). The patients in arm A received 5-FU (800 mg/m2 /day by continuous infusion, days 1–5) (FP) for 6 cycles. Oral capecitabine (1000 mg/m2 b.i.d., days 1–14) (XP) was provided for 6 cycles in Arm B. All patients were followed up according to the set follow-up criteria for up to 6 months after completion of treatment.

Results

At the end of the treatment period, 3.2% patients in Arm B showed complete response (CR). 45.2% and 61.3% patients of Arm A and B showed partial response (PR), respectively. p-value was 0.084 (>0.05). The median progression-free survival (PFS) in Arm A versus Arm B was 5.0 months versus 5.5 months. p-value was 0.19 (>0.05). The most common treatment-related grade 3 or grade 4 toxicities in Arm A versus Arm B were as follows: neutropenia (16.1% versus 16.1%), leukopenia (6.4% versus 3.2%), nausea (3.2% versus 3.2%), vomiting (6.5% versus 6.5%), diarrhoea (3.2% versus 0%), oral mucositis (9.7% versus 3.2%), hand-foot syndrome (0% versus 3.2%). The p-value was not <0.05 for any of these toxicities.

Conclusions

Treatment with a cisplatin-capecitabine regimen is quite effective and more convenient in palliation of symptoms and locoregional control than cisplatin-5-fluorouracil in advanced inoperable gastric cancer.

Clinical trial identification

BSMMU/2017/848(1) - 25/01/2017.

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Institutional Review Board, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University, Dhaka.

Funding

Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.