Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

755P - Comparative clinical efficacy of neoadjuvant (NACT) versus adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) in the treatment of locally advanced penile cancer (PeCa): A proportional meta-analysis of case series

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Penile Cancer

Presenters

Kevin Gallagher

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

K.M. Gallagher, D. Hammoud, P.A. Haddad

Author affiliations

  • Hematology Oncology, LSUHSC-S Feist Weiller Cancer Center/ Overton Brooks VAMC, 71101 - Shreveport/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 755P

Background

Penile cancer (PeCa) is a rare but aggressive malignancy. Despite surgical interventions, men who present with locally advanced disease have a relatively high risk of treatment failures with local and distant metastases. Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) may be of value in mitigating some of this risk, but large comparative or randomized trials are lacking. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in PeCa has been trending over time as it serves as cytoreductive approach to make surgical resection more feasible. However, there are no direct comparisons between these chemotherapy approaches concerning clinical efficacy. The purpose of this proportional meta-analysis is to compare death rates and recurrence rates of NACT versus ACT in locally advanced PeCa.

Methods

A review of the medical literature was conducted using online databases. Inclusion criteria were English language; case series with more than 4 cases; patients with locally advanced PeCa treated with ACT or NACT; and studies documenting clinical outcomes of interest: death rates, recurrence rates, and NACT response rates. Proportional meta-analysis was conducted using the random-effects model.

Results

Eighteen case series (12 NACT with 371 participants, 6 ACT with 181 participants) were included in this proportional meta-analysis. The NACT pooled proportion of death rates (DR), recurrence rates (RcR), and response rates (RR) were 58% (95%CI:52-64), 51% (95%CI:37-65), 52% (95%CI:46-59) respectively. The ACT pooled proportions of DR and RcR were 37% (95%CI:24-48) and 46% (95%CI:38-54) respectively. There was a significant difference with respect to DR but not RcR between NACT and ACT.

Conclusions

This is the first proportional meta-analysis in locally advanced PeCa to show that NACT is associated with higher death rates but not recurrences when compared to ACT. This finding may be the result of increased toxicity of NACT as it interacts with surgical morbidity and mortality. It may also be the result of an inherent selection bias where higher risk locally advanced PeCa are prescribed NACT in attempt to enhance surgical resectability and outcome.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Philip A. Haddad.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.