Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

741P - Clinical outcomes stratified by Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score from a retrospective study of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) who received cabozantinib as part of the UK Managed Access Program (MAP)

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Kate Fife

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S550-S550. 10.1016/annonc/annonc274

Authors

K. Fife1, B.E. Szabados2, B. Klair3, V. Perrot4, A. Michael5, B. Venugopal6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cambridge University Hospitals Nhs Foundation Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, CB2 0QQ - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 Medical Oncology Dept., Barts Cancer Institute, EC1M 6BQ - London/GB
  • 3 Ipsen, Ipsen Ltd, SL1 3XE - Slough/GB
  • 4 Medical Affairs, IPSEN Pharma Biotech SAS, 92100 - Boulogne-Billancourt/FR
  • 5 Oncology, Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, GU2 7XX - Guildford/GB
  • 6 Medical Oncology, NHS Greater Glasgow & Clyde, G12 0XH - Glasgow/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 741P

Background

Before July 2017, cabozantinib was available in the UK via a MAP, thereby generating early clinical experience with this treatment. Here we describe baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with aRCC who received cabozantinib in the UK MAP.

Methods

CERES (NCT03696407), a retrospective chart review conducted at six specialist centres, included adults with treatment-refractory aRCC who received cabozantinib in the UK MAP. Data were collected from the date of RCC diagnosis until 24 months post-cabozantinib initiation or the patient’s death (whichever occurred earlier). We report patient characteristics and, in post hoc analyses, overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) stratified by CCI score. CCI predicts 1-year mortality based on patients’ comorbidities. Each prespecified comorbidity is weighted according to associated mortality risk (score 1–6); higher CCI total scores indicate a higher risk of mortality.

Results

In total, 100 patients received second- or later-line cabozantinib. Median (range) follow-up was 10.84 (0.4–33.5) months. Patient characteristics are reported in the Table. Most patients had an ECOG performance status of 0 (25.8%) or 1 (55.1%). Excluding metastatic solid tumour, the most common comorbidities were moderate to severe chronic kidney disease (52.0%) and uncomplicated diabetes mellitus (11.0%). Median (95% CI) OS and PFS were significantly longer in patients with CCI total scores ≤ 6 versus those with CCI total scores > 6 (OS, 23.52 [16.26–not reached] months versus 7.26 [5.75–9.17] months [p < 0.0001]; PFS, 10.25 [6.80–13.54] months versus 4.73 (2.92–5.85) months [p = 0.0052]).

Conclusions

In this real-world, UK study, most patients with aRCC had additional comorbidities contributing to 1-year mortality risk. Lower CCI total scores were associated with longer OS and PFS. Table: 741P

Patient characteristicsa Full analysis set (N = 100)
Sex, male, n (%) 68 (68.0)
Age, years, median (Q1, Q3) 64 (58, 69)
IMDC risk group, n (%)b
Favourable 19 (19.0)
Intermediate 48 (48.0)
Poor 23 (23.0)
Unknown 10 (10.0)
Charlson Comorbidity Index
Total score, median (Q1, Q3) 8.0 (6.0, 8.0)
Total score >6, n (%)c 63 (63.0)
Total score ≤6, n (%)c 37 (37.0)

aAt cabozantinib initiation unless otherwise stated. bData reflects the assessment that was performed closest to the date of cabozantinib initiation. cAnalyses performed post hoc. IMDC, International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium; Q, quartile

Clinical trial identification

NCT03696407.

Editorial acknowledgement

Dr David Gothard of Oxford PharmaGenesis, Oxford, UK, provided medical writing and editorial support, which was sponsored by Ipsen, in accordance with Good Publication Practice guidelines.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Ipsen.

Funding

Ipsen.

Disclosure

K. Fife: Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: MSD; Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): BMS; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory/Consultancy: Eisai; Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Research grant/Funding (institution): Exelixis; Advisory/Consultancy: Eusa. B.E. Szabados: Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self): Pfizer; Honoraria (self): Ipsen; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche/GNE. B. Klair: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Ipsen. V. Perrot: Full/Part-time employment: Ipsen. A. Michael: Advisory/Consultancy: Clovis; Advisory/Consultancy: Esai; Advisory/Consultancy: Ipsen; Advisory/Consultancy: Tesaro. B. Venugopal: Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: EUSA Pharma; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony, Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Ipsen.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.