Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1086P - Cemiplimab for advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma: Real life experience

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Basal Cell and Squamous Cell Cancers of the Skin

Presenters

Candice Hober

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S672-S710. 10.1016/annonc/annonc280

Authors

C. Hober1, L. Fredeau2, A. Pham Ledard3, M. Boubaya4, F. Herms5, F. Aubin6, N. Benetton7, M. Dinulescu8, A. Jannic9, L. Cesaire10, N. Meyer11, A.B. Duval Modeste12, E. Archier13, C. Lesage14, N. Kramkimel15, J.P. Arnault16, F. Grange17, S. Dalac18, L. Mortier19, E. Maubec20

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hôpital Claude Huriez, 59000 - Lille/FR
  • 2 Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Avicenne, 93000 - Bobigny/FR
  • 3 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, 33000 - Bordeaux/FR
  • 4 Clinical Research, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Avicenne, 93000 - Bobigny/FR
  • 5 Dermatology, Hôpital St Louis, 75010 - Paris/FR
  • 6 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Besançon, 25030 - Besançon/FR
  • 7 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Le Mans, 72000 - Le Mans/FR
  • 8 Dermatology, CHU de Rennes Hôpital Pontchaillou, 35000 - Rennes/FR
  • 9 Dermatology, Hôpital Mondor, 94000 - Créteil/FR
  • 10 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen, 14033 - Caen/FR
  • 11 Dermatology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer et CHU de Toulouse, 31059 - Toulouse/FR
  • 12 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Rouen, 76000 - Rouen/FR
  • 13 Dermatology, Fondation Hôpital Saint Joseph, 13008 - Marseille/FR
  • 14 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de MontpellierHôpital St Eloi, 34295 - Montpellier/FR
  • 15 Dermatology, Hôpital Cochin-Tarnier, 75014 - Paris/FR
  • 16 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens-Picardie, 80054 - Amiens/FR
  • 17 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Reims, 51100 - Reims/FR
  • 18 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Dijon, 21000 - Dijon/FR
  • 19 Dermatology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Lille, Hopital Claude Huriez, 59000 - Lille/FR
  • 20 Dermatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (APHP), Hôpital Avicenne AP-HP and Université Paris 13 Paris 13, 93000 - Bobigny/FR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1086P

Background

Patients (pts) with advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (CSCC) have a poor prognosis. A French early access program (EAP) allowed access to cemiplimab (CEM), a PD-1-blocking antibody, (3 mg/kg/2 wks) in 247 pts with locally advanced (la) or metastatic (m) CSCC.

Methods

This was a retrospective analysis of pts with la/m CSCCs treated with CEM from 45 centers. The primary endpoint was best response rate (RR); secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response (DOR) and safety. Response was assessed by investigators. Adverse events (AEs) were graded according to the CTCAEv5. PFS, OS and DOR were estimated using Kaplan–Meier analysis. Data cutoff was 05/05/20.

Results

Of 247 pts enrolled between 8/18 and 10/19, files of 193 pts (141M/52F; mean age 77 yrs ±13) were collected. Half pts received CEM as a 1st line of systemic treatment. 68% of primary CSCCs were located on head and neck. 37% of pts had la CSCC; 36% had regional disease and 27% distant metastases. 26% of pts were immunocompromised. 72% of pts had PS 0/1. Median number of CEM infusions was 10 (0-35). Among 188 pts who received >1 infusion, the best RR was 50% (CI95% 43-57%, 40 CR, 54 PR); DCR was 60%. Median follow-up was 12 mo (1-20). Median PFS was 11 mo (8—NE), median OS and DOR were not reached; 65% (CI95%, 57-73%) of pts were alive 1 yr after starting CEM. Treatment-related Aes (TRAE) were reported in 49 (26%) pts, the most frequent (>2%) being fatigue, hypothyroidism and cholestasis. A total of 18 (9%) pts experienced ≥1 gr. 3–4 TRAE. There were no treatment-related deaths reported, and 10 (5%) pts discontinued therapy because of TRAE (cholestasis and/or cytolysis (3 cases), anorexia, fatigue, anemia, kidney failure, polyarthritis, DRESS syndrome, colitis).

Conclusions

These results strongly suggest that cemiplimab, in the first French pts treated in real life setting, provided a similar benefit to that observed in clinical trials.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Groupe de Cancérologie Cutanée.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

E. Maubec: Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi; Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.