Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1130P - BRAF and MEK inhibition in CDKN2A germline carriers and BRAF mutant melanoma

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Targeted Therapy

Tumour Site

Melanoma

Presenters

Francesco Spagnolo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S672-S710. 10.1016/annonc/annonc280

Authors

F. Spagnolo1, B. Dalmasso2, H. Helgadottir3, V. Höiom4, R. van Doorn5, E. Kapiteijn6, M. Potrony7, S. Puig7, P. Queirolo8, P. Ghiorzo2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 2 Genetics Of Rare Cancers, Department Of Internal Medicine And Medical Specialties, University of Genoa, and IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 3 Department Of Oncology-pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, 17177 - Stockholm/SE
  • 4 Department Of Oncology Pathology, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, 17176 - Stockholm/SE
  • 5 Department Of Dermatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 - Leiden/NL
  • 6 Department Of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, 2333 - Leiden/NL
  • 7 Melanoma Unit, Dermatology Department, Hospital Clinic de Barcelona, Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Barcelona/ES
  • 8 Melanoma, Sarcoma And Rare Tumors Division, Istituto Europeo di Oncologia, 20141 - Milan/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1130P

Background

Inherited pathogenic variants (PV) in the CDKN2A tumour suppressor gene are among the strongest known risk factors for cutaneous melanoma. CDKN2A encodes for the cell cycle inhibitors p16ink4 and p14ARF, and dysregulation of the p16/RB1 pathway is a well-known mechanism of resistance to MAPK-directed targeted therapy due to the interplay between the two pathways. For this reason, we wondered whether patients with germline CDKN2A PVs may achieve suboptimal results with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

Methods

We identified twenty CDKN2A PVs carriers who received first-line treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors for BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma by reviewing medical records of carriers enrolled in follow-up studies for familial melanoma. By a binomial test, we evaluated if there was a statistically significant difference in the response rate observed in the carriers compared with an expected rate calculated from phase III clinical trials and “real-world” studies.

Results

The baseline prognostic features of the 20 identified patients were poorer than those reported in phase III clinical trials, with 12 patients (60%) having stage M1c disease and 5 patients (25%) brain metastases at baseline. Seventeen patients (85%) achieved a partial response; no complete responses were observed. The overall response rate was numerically higher than that expected from phase III trials (66%), although not statistically significant (p-value=0.097; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97); the difference was statistically significant (p-value=0.012; 95% CI: 0.62-0.97) when the comparison was performed with real-world studies.

Conclusions

The clinical activity of BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with BRAF-mutant advanced melanoma and germline CDKN2A PVs was not inferior to that observed in clinical trials and real-world studies, which we believe is helpful information for clinicians who manage patients with melanoma.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

F. Spagnolo: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self): Roche; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self): Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Sunpharma; Honoraria (self): Sanofi. P. Queirolo: Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Roche; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Sanofi; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Merck; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Sunpharma; Honoraria (self), Advisory/Consultancy: Pierre Fabre. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.