Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1318P - Association between soluble PD-L1 and prognosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Chiara Dellepiane

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S754-S840. 10.1016/annonc/annonc283

Authors

C. Dellepiane1, S. Coco1, M.G. Dal Bello1, G. Rossi1, E. Rijavec2, F. Biello3, M. Tagliamento1, L. Longo1, M. Mora4, G. Anselmi4, A. Alama1, E. Bennicelli1, F. Grossi2, L. Zullo1, K. Beshiri1, A. Bottini1, P. Pronzato1, C. Genova1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Lung Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT
  • 2 Medical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milano/IT
  • 3 Medical Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Maggiore della Carità, 28100 - Novara/IT
  • 4 Pathology Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 - Genova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1318P

Background

Immune checkpoints inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PD-L1 expression on tumor specimens is the only approved predictive biomarker (tissue PD-L1, tPD-L1). However, the outcome of patients treated with ICIs is frequently independent from tPD-L1 status; thus, more suitable biomarkers are needed. In this study, we analyzed the role of soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1) collected from the peripheral blood of patients with advanced NSCLC treated with nivolumab (Nivo) or pembrolizumab (Pembro).

Methods

We evaluated sPD-L1 in baseline plasma samples withdrawn from 196 advanced NSCLC patients, including 118 patients treated with Nivo in second or further lines (range: 1-6 previous lines), 56 patients with high tissue PD-L1 expression (tPD-L1≥50%) treated with Pembro in first line, and 22 patients with low tissue PD-L1 expression (tPD-L1 <50%) treated with chemotherapy (Chemo); additionally, we evaluated sPD-L1 from 88 healthy donors. sPD-L1 was analyzed with enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), by using Dako PD-L1 28-8 pharmDx assay. We explored correlations between sPD-L1 and clinical outcomes of Pembro cohort and Nivo cohort. In addition, we compared sPD-L1 with tPD-L1 in previously untreated patients (Pembro cohort and Chemo cohort).

Results

The sPD-L1 median concentration of 23.92 pg/ml was used as cut- off. sPD-L1 level was higher in patients with advanced NSCLC compared to healthy controls (p<0.0001). Moreover, we found higher concentration of sPD-L1 in previously untreated patients with tPD-L1≥50% versus patients with tPD-L1<50% (p= 0.033). In Pembro cohort, median overall survival in low and high sPD-L1 level groups were 16.0 and 10.9 months, respectively (p=0.045). No difference in progression-free survival or objective response was observed. In Nivo cohort, sPD-L1 was not associated with clinical outcomes.

Conclusions

Our study shows that baseline sPD-L1 is associated with poor prognosis in advanced NSCLC patients treated with Pembro in first line. sPD-L1 was not prognostic for pre-treated patients receiving Nivo. Additional analyses on longitudinal sPD-L1 assessments are ongoing.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Lung Cancer Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

C. Dellepiane: Honoraria (self): BMS; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Roche; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD. G. Rossi, E. Rijavec, F. Biello, M. Tagliamento, E. Bennicelli, F. Grossi, P. Pronzato: Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): BMS. L. Zullo: Honoraria (self): BMS; Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: MSD. C. Genova: Honoraria (self): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self): BMS; Honoraria (self): MSD; Honoraria (self): roche; Honoraria (self): Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.