Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1956P - A real-world feasibility study of patients with solid tumours harbouring NRG1 gene fusions

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Presenters

Ajeet Gajra

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S1034-S1051. 10.1016/annonc/annonc294

Authors

A. Gajra1, A.J. Klink1, J. Kaufman1, J. Laney1, A. Cseh2, K. Fernamberg3, B. Moehring3, S. Jonna4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Speciality Solutions, Cardinal Health, 43017 - Dublin/US
  • 2 Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, 55216 - Ingelheim/DE
  • 3 Oncology Clinical Development And Medical Affairs, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 06877 - Ridgefield/US
  • 4 Division Of Hematology/oncology, Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, 20057 - Washington D.C./US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1956P

Background

Afatinib has shown durable responses in patients (pts) with solid tumours harbouring NRG1 gene fusions. The key objectives of this feasibility assessment were to determine the number of patients with NRG1 gene fusion-positive solid tumours available for analyses, characterise their treatment with afatinib and other systemic therapies, and gain insights into treatment patterns and testing for a larger, retrospective, real-world study.

Methods

US physicians in the Cardinal Health Oncology Provider Extended Network retrospectively abstracted data from medical records on adult pts with any solid tumour carrying a NRG1 gene fusion. Eligible pts had been treated with either afatinib or another systemic therapy (no prior afatinib) in any treatment line between Jan 2017 and Mar 2020 and had been followed up for ≥8 weeks. The target sample size was up to 120 pts. Data were reviewed by Cardinal Health and summarised using descriptive statistics for each treatment group.

Results

Twelve physicians participated (community practices n=9; academic settings n=3). A total of 108 pts with NRG1 gene fusion-positive tumours were identified; 67 pts received afatinib and 41 pts received other therapies. Pt and tumour characteristics and treatment patterns are shown in the table. The most common testing methodologies for NRG1 gene fusions were via mRNA (n=54; 50%) and DNA sequencing (n=28; 26%). Methodology was documented as other for 1 (<1%) pt and unknown for 25 (23%) pts. Testing was performed most frequently prior to first-line therapy (n=64; 59%). The most common fusion partners were CD74 (n=19; 18%) and SDC4 (n=14; 13%). Fusion partners were unknown for 22 (20%) pts. Table: 1956P

Afatinib (n=67) Other (n=41)
Median age, yrs 60 59
Primary tumour type (≥10%*), n (%)
NSCLC 27 (40) 23 (56)
Pancreatic 11 (16) 3 (7)
Colorectal 7 (10) 3 (7)
Cholangiocarcinoma 7 (10) 3 (7)
Breast 3 (4) 4 (10)
Line in which treatment was received, n (%)
1 17 (25) 41 (100)
2 35 (52) 14 (34)
3 14 (21) 3 (7)
4 4 (6) 0
Median treatment duration by line, wks (min–max)
1 36 (20–63) 32 (12–52)
2 30 (10–40) 34 (12–60)
3 18.5 (8–38) 12 (12–12)
4 16 (16–16) n/a
Pts still receiving active therapy, n (%) 31 (46) 13 (32)
Reasons for treatment discontinuation (≥20%*), n (%)
Disease progression 18 (27) 9 (22)
Scheduled therapy completed 2 (3) 15 (37)

*In either group; n=3 pts received afatinib in two lines; pts reported in each line received.

Conclusions

These data support previous findings that NRG1 gene fusions are detected across multiple tumour types, most commonly in lung and gastrointestinal malignancies. Furthermore, these findings provide a rationale to perform a larger, retrospective, chart-based cohort study assessing treatment outcomes in pts with NRG1-positive tumours.

Clinical trial identification

n/a

Editorial acknowledgement

Writing, editorial support, and formatting assistance was provided by Laura Winton of GeoMed, an Ashfield company, part of UDG Healthcare PLC, which was contracted and funded by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (BIPI).

Legal entity responsible for the study

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Funding

Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

Disclosure

A. Gajra, J. Kaufman, J. Laney: Full/Part-time employment: Cardinal Health. A.J. Klink: Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options, Full/Part-time employment: Cardinal Health. A. Cseh, K. Fernamberg, B. Moehring: Full/Part-time employment: Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.