Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

E-Poster Display

1271P - 4-year survival in randomised phase II (POPLAR) and phase III (OAK) studies of atezolizumab (atezo) vs docetaxel (doc) in pre-treated NSCLC

Date

17 Sep 2020

Session

E-Poster Display

Topics

Immunotherapy

Tumour Site

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Presenters

Julien Mazieres

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2020) 31 (suppl_4): S754-S840. 10.1016/annonc/annonc283

Authors

J. Mazieres1, A. Rittmeyer2, S.M. Gadgeel3, T. Hida4, D. Gandara5, D. Cortinovis6, F. Barlesi7, W. Yu8, C. Matheny9, M. Ballinger9, K. Park10

Author affiliations

  • 1 Thoracic Oncology Department, Toulouse University Hospital, 31059 - Toulouse/FR
  • 2 Thoracic Oncology, LKI Lungenfachklinik Immenhausen, Immenhausen/DE
  • 3 Division Of Hematology And Oncology, Department Of Internal Medicine, Henry Ford Cancer Institute/Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit/US
  • 4 Thoracic Oncology Department, Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya/JP
  • 5 Internal Medicine: Hemonc, UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sacramento/US
  • 6 Sc Oncologia Medica, SS Lung Unit Asst Ospedale San Gerardo, Monza/IT
  • 7 Cnrs, Inserm, Crcm, Aphm, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille/FR
  • 8 Us Medical Affairs, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco/US
  • 9 Product Development Oncology, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco/US
  • 10 Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul/KR

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1271P

Background

Atezo (anti–PD-L1) showed overall survival (OS) benefit over doc in the phase II (POPLAR; N=287) and phase III (OAK; N=1225) studies in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC. 4-year survival analysis from both studies is reported for the first time.

Methods

In both studies, pts were randomised 1:1 to receive atezo (1200 mg) or doc (75 mg/m2) IV Q3W; PD-L1 expression was assessed by the Ventana SP142 assay on tumour cells (TC) and tumour-infiltrating immune cells (IC); landmark OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

The minimum follow-up was 53 (POPLAR) and 45 (OAK) mo − an additional 17 and 19 mo follow-up, respectively, from prior reports. 4-year survival rates with atezo vs doc were 14.8% vs 8.1% and 15.5% vs 8.7% in POPLAR and OAK, respectively. The long-term OS benefit of atezo vs doc was seen across histology and PD-L1 expression subgroups. Of pts in the atezo arms who lived ≥4 years in POPLAR (N=15) and OAK (N=43), 40% and 23% were in the PD-L1–high (TC3 or IC3) subgroup, 33% and 37% were in the PD-L1–negative (TC0 and IC0) subgroup, and 87% and 88% had non-squamous histology, respectively. Among 4-year survivors in the doc arms, 2/4 (50%) and 17/26 (65%) received subsequent immunotherapy in POPLAR and OAK, respectively, vs 3/15 (20%) and 10/43 (23%) in the atezo arms. Fewer Grade 3-4 treatment (tx)-related adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to tx withdrawal occurred in the atezo vs doc arms in both studies.

Conclusions

4-year OS rates favoured atezo vs doc regardless of histology and PD-L1 expression in both studies, despite a high rate of subsequent immunotherapy in the doc arm. The PD-L1–high subgroups continued to derive the greatest OS benefit with atezo vs doc; however, the PD-L1–negative subgroups also sustained an improved long-term OS benefit with atezo vs doc. Most pts in the doc arms received subsequent immunotherapy. Atezo tx was well tolerated, and safety was consistent with prior reports. Table: 1271P

4-yr landmark OS rates in POPLAR and OAK

Population 4-yr OS rate, %
POPLAR OAK
N Atezo % Doc % Δ% (95% CI) N Atezo % Doc % Δ% (95% CI)
ITT 287 14.8 8.1 6.7 (−1.1, 14.4) 1225 15.5 8.7 6.8 (2.8, 10.8)
PD-L1 expression subgroups
TC3 or IC3 47 33.3 14.9 18.4 (−5.8, 42.7) 174 27.8 9.8 18.1 (6.1, 30.0)
TC2/3 or IC2/3 105 19.1 7.9 11.2 (−2.2, 24.6) 350 19.9 11.9 8.0 (−0.6, 16.7)
TC1/2/3 or IC1/2/3 195 14.6 8.5 6.2 (−3.2, 15.5) 684 16.8 11.8 5.0 (−0.8, 10.8)
TC0 and IC0 92 15.2 6.8 8.4 (−5.6, 55.4) 531 13.9 5.1 8.7 (3.3, 14.2)
Histology subgroups
Non-squamous 190 18.6 10.0 8.6 (−1.7, 19.0) 904 17.9 10.1 7.7 (2.8, 12.7)
Squamous 97 7.0 NE NE 321 8.5 4.8 3.7 (−2.4, 9.9)

NE, not estimable. P values not presented due to small sample sizes.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01903993 (POPLAR), NCT02008227 (OAK).

Editorial acknowledgement

Medical writing assistance for this abstract was provided by Kshipra Desai, PhD of Health Interactions, and funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.

Legal entity responsible for the study

F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.

Funding

F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd.

Disclosure

J. Mazieres: Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy: Merck & Co.; Advisory/Consultancy: Pierre Fabre; Advisory/Consultancy: Hengruii; Advisory/Consultancy: Daiichi; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer; Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda. A. Rittmeyer: Advisory/Consultancy: AbbVie; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: BMS; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy: Eli Lilly; Advisory/Consultancy: MSD; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Pfizer; Advisory/Consultancy: Roche. S.M. Gadgeel: Advisory/Consultancy: Genentech/Roche; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (self), Travel/Accommodation/Expenses: Merck; Advisory/Consultancy: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Takeda; Advisory/Consultancy: Novartis; Advisory/Consultancy: Daiichi Sankyo. T. Hida: Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Chugai Pharmaceuticals ; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Ono Pharmaceutical; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Bristol-Myers Squibb; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck & Co. D. Gandara: Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Amgen; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Merck; Advisory/Consultancy, Research grant/Funding (institution): Genentech/Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Institutional Contract: AstraZeneca; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Institutional Contract: Guardant Health; Advisory/Consultancy: Inviata; Advisory/Consultancy, Institutional Contract: IO Biotech; Advisory/Consultancy: OnoCyte. D. Cortinovis: Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Roche; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Merck & Co.; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: Bristol-Myers Squibb; Advisory/Consultancy: Boehringer Ingelheim; Advisory/Consultancy, Speaker Bureau/Expert testimony: AstraZeneca. F. Barlesi: Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: AstraZeneca; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Bayer; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: BMS; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Boehringer Ingelheim; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Eli Lilly Oncology; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Roche; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Novartis; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Merck; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): MSD; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution), Non-remunerated activity/ies: Pierre Fabre; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Pfizer; Honoraria (self), Research grant/Funding (institution): Takeda; Research grant/Funding (institution): AbbVie; Research grant/Funding (institution): ACEA; Research grant/Funding (institution): Amgen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Eisai; Research grant/Funding (institution): Genentech; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ipsen; Research grant/Funding (institution): Ignyta; Research grant/Funding (institution): Innate Pharma; Research grant/Funding (institution): Loxo; Research grant/Funding (institution): MedImmune; Research grant/Funding (institution): Sanofi-Aventis. W. Yu, C. Matheny, M. Ballinger: Full/Part-time employment: Genentech; Shareholder/Stockholder/Stock options: Roche. K. Park: Advisory/Consultancy: Roche.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.