Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail and Poster Display session

111P - Reporting of late serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in drug labels of targeted anticancer agents

Date

26 Feb 2024

Session

Cocktail and Poster Display session

Presenters

Dimitar Stefanovski

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_1): 1-4. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102329

Authors

D. Stefanovski1, D. Ribnikar1, D. Manevski2, B. Seruga1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, 1000 - Ljubljana/SI
  • 2 Institute For Biostatistics And Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia, 1000 - Ljubljana/SI

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 111P

Background

New safety concerns of targeted anticancer agents often emerge in the first few years after their regulatory approval. However, a long-term trajectory of the emergence of these safety concerns is not known. Here we analyzed updated drug labels of approved targeted anticancer agents for the reporting of late serious ADRs.

Methods

Targeted anticancer agents approved by the U.S. Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) before July 2013 were eligible for our study. For each agent serious ADRs (hereafter ADRs) and potentially fatal ADRs were identified in the Warnings & Precautions (W&P) and Boxed warnings (BW) sections of the FDA updated drug labels. Any new serious ADR first reported in the updated drug label ≥ 5 years after approval of the corresponding anticancer was defined as late ADR. Analysis was stratified by the drug type (small molecule targeted agents [SMs] vs. monoclonal antibodies [mAbs]) and by the availability of the companion diagnostics for biomarkers (yes vs. no).

Results

We analyzed 36 anticancer agents (25 SMs and 11 mAbs). A median time between initial drug approval and the last updated drug label was 11.8 yrs (range 6.8 – 24 yrs). Over time new ADRs appeared in updated labels of 34 (94%) agents. At least one late ADR was reported for 30 (83%) agents. On average, numerically higher number of late ADRs emerged in updated drug labels of SMs as compared to mAbs, respectively (2.4 vs. 1.5; p=0.06). Similarly, updated labels of agents without companion diagnostics for biomarkers, on average, reported numerically higher number of late ADRs (2.3 vs. 1.5; p=0.33). Late potentially fatal ADRs were reported for only 2 (6%) agents.

Conclusions

Serious safety concerns of anticancer agents are often newly reported in updated drug labels more than five years after their regulatory approval. Oncologists prescribing targeted anticancer agents should be vigilant for late ADRs in everyday clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

D. Ribnikar: Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Novartis. B. Seruga: Other, Institutional, Advisory Board: Astellas, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.