Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cocktail and Poster Display session

82P - Impact of compassionate access drugs in a low-middle income country such as India

Date

26 Feb 2024

Session

Cocktail and Poster Display session

Topics

Cancer Care Equity Principles and Health Economics

Tumour Site

Presenters

Naveen K

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_1): 1-4. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102302

Authors

N. K, A.C. Singh, V. Noronha, A.P. Joshi, V.M. Patil, N.S. Menon, K. Prabhash

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology Dept., Tata Memorial Hospital - Parel, 400012 - Mumbai/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 82P

Background

Patients in a low-middle income country such as India do not have access to adequate clinical trials. Hence despite many newer drugs showing significant impact in cancer disease control in clinical trials they are not accessible to our patients. Here we present the impact of these drugs for the few of these patients who received them through compassionate access.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective audit of patients who received compassionate access drugs at the Medical Oncology Department, Tata Memorial Hospital, Mumbai, between August 2020 and July 2023. We analysed the data primarily for progression free survival, overall survival, and safety profile.

Results

A total of 36 patients received compassionate access drugs in the specified period. Of these 36 patients, 78.4% (n=29) had metastatic NSCLC, 8.1% (n=3) had metastatic medullary thyroid cancer with RET fusion, 5.4% (n=2) had metastatic bladder cancer with FGFR alteration, 2.7% (n=1) had metastatic nasal cavity adenocarcinoma with EGFR exon 20 insertion, and 2.7% (n=1) had metastatic vaginal skene gland adenocarcinoma with RET fusion. Among 29 patients with metastatic NSCLC, 34.5% (n=10) had MET alteration, 27.5%% (n=8) had EGFR exon 20 insertion, 24.1% (n=7) had RET gene fusion, 10.3% (n=3) had ROS 1 gene fusion, and 3.4% (n=1) had NTRT gene fusion. Targeted drugs received included selpercatinib 25% (n=9), capmatinib and tepotinib each 13.9% (n=5), amivantamab, mobocertinib and entrectinib each 11.1% (n=4), pralsetinib and erdafitinib each 5.5% (n=2) and poziotinib 2.6% (n=1). Median of 3.1 lines of therapy were received by the patients before starting the compassionate access drug. Median progression-free survival was 12.18 months (95% CI 4.27-20.10). Median overall survival was 42.28 months (95% CI 20.74-63.82). Median duration of response was 21.88 months. Overall, 86% patients had any grade of drug-related adverse event, but only 25% (n=9) had grade 3, and no grade 4 or grade 5 adverse events were seen.

Conclusions

Those who received compassionate access drugs have shown significant disease control and survival improvement even though they received this drug after multiple lines of therapy with fair tolerance. So, it is worth increasing the access to these drugs to populations from low-middle income country such as India.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.