Abstract 21P
Background
CRPC patients (pts) with loss-of-function alterations in genes associated with homologous recombination (HR) can derive benefit from both PARPi and PlCh. Cross-resistance between these agents is well recognized in other tumour types and evidence of ‘reversion’ mutations in HR genes is emerging. Yet, optimal treatment sequence and data on cross-resistance in CRPC is lacking.
Methods
In this retrospective pre-planned single-centre study we describe intra-patient responses to PlCh and PARPi, assessed by the order of these HR-deficiency-targeting-agents (HRDtA; PARPi→PlCh or PlCh→PARPi). All pts were treated with both PlCh and PARPi, but agents were not necessarily given directly sequential.
Results
All 28 CRPC pts were metastatic and HR deficient, mostly due to BRCA2 inactivation (79%). Sixteen pts received PARPi→PlCh and 12 PlCh→PARPi. Pts with PlCh→PARPi had a significant shorter time to CRPC (median 10 vs. 18 months, P=0.040) and were significantly more often synchronous metastatic (92% vs. 44%, P=0.016). Progression-free survival (PFS) on the initial HRDtA was longer than the PFS on the subsequent HRDtA (median 5.3 versus 3.4 months, P=0.016). The median PFS on PARPi, given as subsequent HRDtA, was 0.9 months shorter than when administered first. For PlCh the PFS was 3.6 months shorter as subsequent HRDtA than as initial. Of the PARPi→PlCh pts, 6/16 (38%) had a >50% PSA decline to PlCh and 2/8 (25%) evaluable pts had a radiographic response to PlCh. In the PlCh→PARPi group, 6/10 (60%) evaluable pts had a >50% PSA decline to PARPi and 5/9 (56%) a radiographic response to PARPi. In total, 12/26 (46%) had a >50% PSA decline and 7/17 (41%) a radiographic response to a subsequent HRDtA. Overall survival from CRPC did not significantly differ depending on the order of HRDtA (PARPi→PlCh 45 months vs. PlCh→PARPi 33 months, hazard ratio 1.42, P=0.401).
Conclusions
This study suggests cross-resistance between PARPi and PlCh in HR deficient CRPC pts. PlCh appears to induce less cross-resistance to PARPi than vice versa. Still, >40% of the cohort is sensitive to a subsequent HRDtA. Serial assessment of (liquid) biopsies is warranted to unravel the mechanisms defining cross-resistance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
I.M. Van Oort: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Role: Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, MSD/AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Astellas, Janssen, Bayer. J. Schalken: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas, Bayer. N. Mehra: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Astellas, JNJ; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Astellas, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Head of the Prostate Cancer Working Group: Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, co-PI: Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (Netherlands); Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
13P - Universal prospects of cryopreserved umbilical cord blood CD34+ progenitor cell-derived NK cells: Clinical and preclinical evaluation of non-engineered and genetically engineered candidates
Presenter: Anna-Maria Georgoudaki
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
14P - Lentivirally overexpressed c-Myc promoter binding protein (MBP-1) localizes in the cytoplasm of human cutaneous melanoma cell lines increasing cell proliferation and glycolysis rate
Presenter: Miriam Hippner-Kunicka
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
15P - Enhancement Platform for immune Cells (EPiC): invIOs’s innovative cell-therapy platform for creating personalized cancer treatments
Presenter: Mario Kuttke
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
16P - Melatonin modulates energy metabolism and kinases signaling in ovarian cancer cells
Presenter: Luiz Gustavo Chuffa
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
17P - New therapeutic target in triple-negative breast cancer for enhancing PARP inhibitor efficacy and stimulating the anti-tumour immune response
Presenter: Marina Rodriguez-Candela Mateos
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
18P - PARP1 trapping and hyperactivation by the decoy agonist OX425 induces DNA repair abrogation and a robust anti-tumor immune response
Presenter: Vlada Zakharova
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
20P - Mutational signature-based identification of DNA repair deficient gastroesophageal adenocarcinomas for therapeutic targeting
Presenter: Pranshu Sahgal
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Emerging role of histone acetyltransferase CBP in breast cancer cells undergoing DNA damage
Presenter: Wafaa Ramadan
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Synthetic lethality by targeting RHEB in ARID1A-mutated luminal breast cancer
Presenter: Deniz Gulfem Ozturk
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) as a target for epigenetic therapies: A case review for a new approach to target tumors with somatic mutations/amplifications of FGFR
Presenter: M. Nezami
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract