Abstract 21P
Background
CRPC patients (pts) with loss-of-function alterations in genes associated with homologous recombination (HR) can derive benefit from both PARPi and PlCh. Cross-resistance between these agents is well recognized in other tumour types and evidence of ‘reversion’ mutations in HR genes is emerging. Yet, optimal treatment sequence and data on cross-resistance in CRPC is lacking.
Methods
In this retrospective pre-planned single-centre study we describe intra-patient responses to PlCh and PARPi, assessed by the order of these HR-deficiency-targeting-agents (HRDtA; PARPi→PlCh or PlCh→PARPi). All pts were treated with both PlCh and PARPi, but agents were not necessarily given directly sequential.
Results
All 28 CRPC pts were metastatic and HR deficient, mostly due to BRCA2 inactivation (79%). Sixteen pts received PARPi→PlCh and 12 PlCh→PARPi. Pts with PlCh→PARPi had a significant shorter time to CRPC (median 10 vs. 18 months, P=0.040) and were significantly more often synchronous metastatic (92% vs. 44%, P=0.016). Progression-free survival (PFS) on the initial HRDtA was longer than the PFS on the subsequent HRDtA (median 5.3 versus 3.4 months, P=0.016). The median PFS on PARPi, given as subsequent HRDtA, was 0.9 months shorter than when administered first. For PlCh the PFS was 3.6 months shorter as subsequent HRDtA than as initial. Of the PARPi→PlCh pts, 6/16 (38%) had a >50% PSA decline to PlCh and 2/8 (25%) evaluable pts had a radiographic response to PlCh. In the PlCh→PARPi group, 6/10 (60%) evaluable pts had a >50% PSA decline to PARPi and 5/9 (56%) a radiographic response to PARPi. In total, 12/26 (46%) had a >50% PSA decline and 7/17 (41%) a radiographic response to a subsequent HRDtA. Overall survival from CRPC did not significantly differ depending on the order of HRDtA (PARPi→PlCh 45 months vs. PlCh→PARPi 33 months, hazard ratio 1.42, P=0.401).
Conclusions
This study suggests cross-resistance between PARPi and PlCh in HR deficient CRPC pts. PlCh appears to induce less cross-resistance to PARPi than vice versa. Still, >40% of the cohort is sensitive to a subsequent HRDtA. Serial assessment of (liquid) biopsies is warranted to unravel the mechanisms defining cross-resistance.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
I.M. Van Oort: Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Role: Bayer, Astellas, Janssen, MSD/AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Astellas, Janssen, Bayer. J. Schalken: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Astellas, Bayer. N. Mehra: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Roche, MSD, AstraZeneca, Astellas, JNJ; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Astellas, Pfizer; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: BMS, Janssen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: AstraZeneca, BMS; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, Head of the Prostate Cancer Working Group: Dutch Uro-Oncology Study Group; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Principal Investigator, co-PI: Prospective Bladder Cancer Infrastructure (Netherlands); Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Registry. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2P - SOT102, a novel CLDN18.2-targeting antibody-drug conjugate for gastric and pancreatic cancer with a wide range of the tumor target expression
Presenter: Radek Spisek
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
3P - Correlation between antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) targetable antigen expression and occurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD)
Presenter: Solange Peters
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
4P - Optimizing utilization of antibody-drug conjugates in NSCLC by identification of subsets using RNA sequencing
Presenter: Edwin Lin
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
5P - Tisotumab vedotin (TV) dose schedule optimization in non-cervical populations
Presenter: Jenna Voellinger
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
6P - RC48-ADC for metastatic salivary duct carcinoma with HER2 expression: A single-center retrospective study
Presenter: jun Cao
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
7P - Global ring study determining reproducibility & comparability of CLDN18 testing assays in gastric cancer
Presenter: Bharat Jasani
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
8P - Targeting antiapoptotic Bcl-2 proteins with highly specific BH3 mimetics in solid tumors
Presenter: Benjamin Sobol
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
9P - An in vivo model for therapeutic antibody efficacy evaluation: The chicken embryo’s CAM-based assay
Presenter: Yan Wang
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
11P - Successful transfer and prolonged persistence of engineered lymphocytes with T-cell receptor targeting NY-ESO-1
Presenter: Johnathan Arnon
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
12P - CRISPR/Cas9-induced knock-out of DGKαζ in TAG-72 CAR-T cells improves function and persistence in ovarian cancer
Presenter: Vera Evtimov
Session: Cocktail & Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract