Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

122P - Risk stratification in soft tissue sarcoma: A single-center experience using Sarculator

Date

21 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Patricia Capdevila Gaudens

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2025) 10 (suppl_3): 1-30. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop104375

Authors

P. Capdevila Gaudens, C. Carrasco Picazo, J.M. Esteve Gallego, E.J. Soria, E. Gomez Roch, C. Escrivá Aranda, A. Ortiz Gracia, D. Vidal Jiménez, R. Diaz Beveridge

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico la Fe, 46026 - Valencia/ES

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 122P

Background

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are rare, heterogeneous malignancies requiring prognostic tools to guide treatment. Sarculator is a validated nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS) and recurrence risk in resected STS. However, data validating its performance outside its initial cohorts are limited. This study evaluates Sarculator’s predictive performance and utility for risk stratification in patients treated with neoadjuvant or adjuvant ifosfamide-epirubicin chemotherapy (CT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 62 STS patients treated with (neo)adjuvant CT at our center (2014–2023). Of these, 32 received neoadjuvant and 30 adjuvant CT. Patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were reviewed. Sarculator-predicted OS was calculated and compared with actual OS at 5 years. Kaplan-Meier survival analyses and log-rank tests evaluated risk groups and survival outcomes.

Results

Median age was 48 years (16–76). Median tumor size was 10 cm; 93.5% presented tumors >5 cm. High-grade tumors (77.4%) predominated. Neurovascular and bone invasion were observed in 38.7% and 12.9%, respectively. Most tumors were in extremities (67.7%) and trunk (21%). 79% receive the expected three cycles of CT. Complete resections (R0) were achieved in 78.5%, while R1 and R2 resections occurred in 12.9% and 9.7%, respectively. 72.6% received (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy. At a median follow-up of 73 months, 58.1% of patients remained disease-free. Recurrence occurred in 41.9% (distant 50%, local 34.6%, combined 15.4%). Five-year OS was 70.8%, comparable to Sarculator's predicted OS of 71%. Stratified by Sarculator, high-risk patients exhibited worse outcomes (OS: 65.9% vs. 77.2%). Risk factors associated with worse OS included high grade (p=0.01), histology (p=0.01), positive margins (R1/R2, p=0.01), retroperitoneal location (p=0.001), relapses (p=0.001). Poor chemotherapy response also correlated with lower OS (p=0.001).

Conclusions

Sarculator effectively stratifies risk in STS patients receiving multimodal treatment. Predicted OS closely mirrored observed outcomes, supporting its integration into clinical decision-making. Further studies incorporating molecular markers may enhance prognostic accuracy.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

During the preparation of this work the author(s) used chat GPT in order to translate the abstract. After using this tool/service, the author(s) reviewed and edited the content as needed and take(s) full responsibility for the content of the publication.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.