Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

69P - Efficacy and safety of eribulin in liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Date

21 Mar 2025

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ekram Hasanin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2025) 10 (suppl_3): 1-30. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop104375

Authors

E.H. Hasanin1, H. Khelifa2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medicine Department, University of Tripoli, 00218 - Tripoli/LY
  • 2 Medicine, Faculté de Médecine - Université Oran1 Ahmed Ben Bella, 31000 - Oran/DZ

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 69P

Background

Liposarcoma (LPS) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) are rare forms of soft tissue sarcoma characterized by an aggressive course and limited therapeutic alternatives at an advanced stage. Eribulin mesylate, a synthetic microtubule inhibitor with initial approval for metastatic breast cancer, has shown promise in improving survival in patients with Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma . This study explores the clinical utility of Eribulin in improving overall survival, progression-free survival, and treatment response rates in patients with liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma.

Methods

We conducted a comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane from their inception to January 2025, focusing on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies evaluating Eribulin for the treatment of Liposarcoma and Leiomyosarcoma. Meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model, with adverse events reported as the number of events and total patients. This approach was critical for calculating odds ratios (ORs) and mean differences (MDs), along with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

Results

Out of 1,363 studies initially screened, 14 studies met the inclusion criteria for our meta-analysis, comprising 1,844 adult patients. The overall gender distribution included 1,199 females (65%) and 645 males (35%). Eribulin demonstrates significant efficacy in improving survival outcomes, with an Overall Survival (OS) proportion of 0.70 (95% CI: 0.58–0.82, P < 0.0001) and a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) proportion of 0.74 (95% CI: 0.62–0.86, P < 0.0001). The Objective Response Rate (ORR) was 0.16 (95% CI: 0.06–0.26, P < 0.0001), and the safety profile showed adverse event rates of neutropenia at 0.63 (95% CI: 0.63–0.77, P < 0.0001), anemia at 0.42 (95% CI: 0.28–0.57, P < 0.0001), and fatigue at 0.36 (95% CI: 0.22-0.49, P < 0.0001), supporting its role as a valuable treatment for liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma.

Conclusions

Eribulin improves survival in liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma with a manageable safety profile, highlighting its value as an effective treatment and the need for further research to optimize its clinical use.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.