Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

117P - Prognostic factors and outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment in osteosarcoma: A single national center experience in Peru

Date

15 Mar 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Jessica Meza

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 9 (suppl_2): 1-32. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop102441

Authors

J. Meza1, J.C. Haro Varas1, V.R. Paitan Amaro1, J. Medina2, J. Sanchez1, M. Alcalde3, C. Pacheco1, L. Zeta4, V. Castro Oliden1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology Department, INEN - Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, 15038 - Lima/PE
  • 2 Pathology, INEN - Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, 15038 - Lima/PE
  • 3 Radiology, INEN - Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas, 15038 - Lima/PE
  • 4 Medicine, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia-North Campus, 15102 - Lima/PE

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 117P

Background

Osteosarcoma is a primary bone tumor characterized by being chemosensitive. MAP is the standard treatment which has been widely used in Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplasicas (INEN). In this abstract, we focus on evaluating the prognostic factors and outcomes in neoadjuvant treatment at INEN.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all non-metastatic osteosarcoma patients seen at INEN in Lima-Peru between November 2014 to February 2023. We report patients with the following criteria: (1) typical histological and radiological features of primary central high-grade osteosarcoma; (2) age >14 years; (3) primary tumor located in the extremities; (4) no previous treatment, (5) non-metastatic tumors and (6) all patients treated by MAP regimen. Survival analysis was performed using Kaplan Meier Stimate, also we made bivarial analysis using mortality as event of interest versus other characteristics of the patient, chemotherapy and surgery, a value of p<0.05 was considered as significant.

Results

A total of 47 non-metastatic osteosarcoma cases were identified. Median age at diagnosis was 19.4 years (range: 14-36) and thirty-four percent (n=16) of patients were older than 20 years-old at the time of diagnosis and 63.83% (n=30) of the patients were male. 60% (n=28) had radical surgery and 40% (n=18) had sparing surgery. In a bivariate analysis, we found an association between mortality and time of recurrence (p=0.02), chemotherapy toxicity (p=0.026) and number of chemotherapy (p=0.033). More than 50% of patients without joint involvement were alive at 2 years and those with involvement died entirely (p = 0.02). Based on this, joint involvement represents a 3.55-fold increased risk of mortality in the follow-up period [HR=3.55; p=0.036; IC95% (1.08-11.64)]. The OS at 20 months was 48.15% and while the OS at 24 months was 25.93%.

Conclusions

This is the first study describing the outcomes of neoadjuvant treatment with MAP regimen non-metastatic OS in Peru. We found that patients with joint involvement had a worse prognosis in terms of OS. Mortality increases after 20 months of follow-up. Further studies are required to explain this increase in mortality.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.