Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

76P - Thoracic synovial sarcoma: A single-center, real-world analysis of treatment paradigms and clinical outcomes

Date

21 Mar 2023

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Ghazal Tansir

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_3): 101026-101026. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101026

Authors

G. Tansir1, S. Rastogi2, S. Fernandes3, S. Ahmed Shamim4, E. Dhamija5, A. Barwad6, R. Pandey7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 201301 - Noida/IN
  • 2 Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN
  • 3 Medical Oncology, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN
  • 4 Nuclear Medicine, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN
  • 5 Radiodiagnosis, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN
  • 6 Pathology, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN
  • 7 Radiation Oncology, AIIMS - All India Institute of Medical Sciences, 110029 - New Delhi/IN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 76P

Background

Thoracic synovial sarcoma (SS) comprises of only 1-2% of all SS, hence data pertaining to it is sparse. This site is unique due to the involvement of vital mediastinal structures and the need for expert surgical and medical management.

Methods

This is a retrospective study utilising the patient database maintained at our Sarcoma Medical Oncology Clinic. We included patients (pts) with thoracic SS registered between 2017 to 2022. SPSS 26.0 was used for statistical analysis; Overall Survival (OS) and Progression-free Survival (PFS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method.

Results

22 eligible pts were identified with 12 (54.5%) males, and median age of 34.5 years (16-54). Common symptoms were chest pain (10, 45.4%), dyspnea (9, 41%), cough (6, 27.2%). ECOG Performance Status was 1 in 12 (54.5%) pts, 2/3 in 9 (40.9%) and 4 in 1 (4.5%). 15 (68.2%) pts had metastatic, 3 (13.6%) had localised (L) and 4 (18.6%) had locally advanced (LA) disease. 8 were L/LA at baseline with median time to metastases of 26 (2.5-49) months. Mean tumor size was 9.6 centimetres (2-20). Primary sites were lung (n=10), mediastinum (n=6), chest wall (n=4), pleura, heart (n=1 each). Metastatic sites were lung (n=10), pleural effusion (n=3), mediastinum (n=3) and atypical sites as breast (n=1), brain (n=1), bone (n=1). SS18 rearrangement was present in 15 pts. Ifosfamide/doxorubicin was given as adjuvant treatment to 6 pts and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) to 8 pts; 2 pts received concomitant dexrazoxane. Predominant response to NACT was stable disease (4/8) and partial response (2/8). Median 2 (1-5) lines of treatment (LoT) included doxorubicin-based regimens in first-line (18/19) and others as in the table. Median OS was 41 (22-59) months in all, and 10 months in pts with upfront metastases (p=0.008). Table: 76P

Medical treatments received for thoracic SS

Drug n (%) Median PFS months (range)
First-line Ifosfamide+/- doxorubicin High-dose ifosfamide 18 (94.8) 1 (5.2) 12 (9-14.6)
Second-line Gemcitabine-docetaxel (GD) Pazopanib High-dose ifosfamide Doxorubicin 4 (36.3) 4 (36.3) 2 (18.1) 1 (9) 3 (2-3.9)
Third-line Pazopanib Trabectedin High-dose ifosfamide Regorafenib 3 (42.8) 2 (28.5) 1 (14.2) 1 (14.2) 7 (3.4-10.5)
Fourth-line Pazopanib Regorafenib Anlotinib Trabectedin 1 (25) 1 (25) 1 (25) 1 (25) 3 (1-4.9)
Fifth-line GD Regorafenib 1 (50) 1 (50) not reached

Conclusions

Thoracic SS affects young pts and presents with advanced disease. Survival is poorer in those with upfront metastases. Further data on subsequent LoT and use of dexrazoxane in this subset needs to be generated.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.