Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

54P - Evaluation with FDG-PET during pretreatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumour, GIST, with imatinib

Date

21 Mar 2023

Session

Poster display session

Presenters

Stefan Lindskog

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_3): 101026-101026. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop101026

Authors

S. Lindskog1, E. Hancke1, M. Berndsen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Endocrine And Sarcoma Unit, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sahlgrenska Academy, 413 45 - Göteborg/SE
  • 2 Endocrine And Sarcoma Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 - Göteborg/SE

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 54P

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumour, GIST, is the most common intra-abdominal sarcoma and can occur throughout the gastrointestinal tract but most often in the stomach or small intestine. The treatment is surgical resection, sometimes combined with an adjuvant tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Neoadjuvant treatment with imatinib is indicated for large tumours and to minimize postoperative morbidity. The effect of the neoadjuvant treatment depends on the sensitivity of the tumour-driving mutation to imatinib. It is evaluated structurally with a computed tomography scan or metabolically with FDG-PET. We have investigated the clinical utility of FDG-PET in the neoadjuvant treatment setting of GIST at Sahlgrenska University Hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden.

Methods

We identified patients diagnosed with GIST between 2002 and 2020 who received pretreatment with imatinib at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. The response was assessed based on the FDG-PET examinations and compared with the mutational analysis.

Results

Of 125 patients who received neoadjuvant imatinib, 69 had at least one PET scan. Mutation analysis was missing in 19 patients, so the patient cohort consisted of 51 patients. Tumours with mutations sensitive to imatinib showed a response to PET in 87% (n=34) of patients with an odds ratio of 4.86 (p=0.037). In cases where the sensitivity of the tumour mutation to imatinib was uncertain, reduced FDG uptake at PET occurred in 58% (n=7) of the patients.

Conclusions

The PET examination was often challenging to interpret. It contributed to managing patients without FDG-PET response and with an uncertain imatinib-sensitive tumour mutation. Evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment with FDG-PET was unnecessary in patients with imatinib-sensitive tumour mutation.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

Stefan Lindskog.

Funding

Gothenburg University.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.