Abstract 136P
Background
We conducted a multicenter, open-label, phase 2 study to evaluate TIS + platinum-based chemo (cohort 1) or TIS + mono-chemo + beva (cohort 2) in EGFR-mutated nsq-NSCLC pts who progressed on EGFR TKI therapies. Our previous results showed that both cohorts met the primary endpoint (1-year PFS rate). Here, we report the updated analysis with extended follow-up.
Methods
EGFR-mutated, nsq-NSCLC pts who had failed prior EGFR-TKIs received induction therapy with TIS + carboplatin (CBP) + nab-paclitaxel (nab-P; cohort 1) or TIS + nab-P + beva (cohort 2) every 3 weeks for 4 cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with TIS + pemetrexed (cohort 1) or TIS + beva (cohort 2) for up to 31 cycles.
Results
A total of 123 pts were enrolled (cohort 1, n=69; cohort 2, n=54). As of Aug 2, 2024, minimum study follow-up time (from the last patient’s first dose to data cutoff) was 32.3 and 17.1 mo, respectively for cohort 1 and cohort 2. Median OS was 27.1 mo in cohort 1, and 2-year and 3-year OS rates were 53.5% and 38.2%, respectively. For cohort 2, median OS was not reached, with 2-year OS rate of 61.4%. Pts with EGFR exon 21 L858R mutation had significantly longer OS than those with exon 19 deletion in cohort 1, while no similar trend was observed in cohort 2. Median PFS was 7.6 and 10.3 mo, respectively (Table). After prolonged follow-up, toxicity was manageable, with no new safety signals observed in both cohorts. Table: 136P
Cohort 1 TIS + CBP + nab-P | Cohort 2 TIS + nab-P+ beva | |
Minimum study follow-up time∗, mo | 32.3 | 17.1 |
Median OS, mo (95% CI) | 27.1 (17.5, 36.9) | NR (19.2, NE) |
OS rate, % (95% CI) | ||
1-year | 75.2 (62.2, 84.2) | 78.8 (65.1, 87.7) |
2-year | 53.5 (40.1, 65.1) | 61.4 (45.3, 74.1) |
3-year | 38.2 (24.9, 51.5) | NR (NE, NE) |
Median PFS, mo (95% CI) | 7.6 (5.8, 9.4) | 10.3 (6.4, 14.5) |
1-year PFS rate, % (90% CI) | 25.4 (16.4, 35.3) | 42.2 (30, 53.8) |
∗From the last patient’s first dose to data cutoff. NR, not reached; NE, not estimable.
Conclusions
TIS + platinum-based chemo (cohort 1) and TIS + mono-chemo + beva (cohort 2) demonstrated encouraging OS benefits and manageable toxicity for pts with EGFR-mutated nsq-NSCLC after EGFR TKI failure with extended follow-up. This study expands the treatment options for this patient population, allowing clinicians to tailor their choices based on individual patient circumstances.
Clinical trial identification
NCT04405674.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
BeiGene Ltd.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session