Abstract 161P
Background
In 2009, a clinical trial treated patients with advanced melanoma, with TAP cells stimulated ex vivo with tumor lysates (Trimel), achieving long survival results (López et al. JCO 2009). Based on these results, direct inoculation of TrimelVax vaccine was tested in a murine model of B16F10 melanoma. The vaccine consisted of tumor lysates (from 3 human melanoma cell lines, heat-shock treated and then lysed) combined with a hemocyanin. The murines were treated with either TrimelVax, nivolumab, both or a serum control. Murines exposed to TrimelVax and TrimelVax plus nivolumab achieved longer survival, better tumor response, and higher infiltration of TCD8 lymphocytes in tumors, as compared to controls (Gleisner et al. JIC 2021).
Methods
We conducted a phase 1 clinical trial to test the safety of TrimelVax in patients with unresectable stage III or IV melanoma after first-line treatment with anti-PD1 antibody. The trial is registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06556004) and approved by the institutional ethics committee. We aimed to administer the vaccine every four weeks for four doses to 20 patients. The main objective was to assess the therapy's safety, according to CTCAE 5.0. Secondary objectives were: specific immune response, tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS).
Results
Between January 2022 and November 2023, 20 patients were recruited. 19 had progressed on previous anti-PD1 treatment, and one had stopped treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Two patients did not start treatment for non-medical reasons, and one was excluded due to failure to meet selection criteria, five patients did not complete the intervention due to progression, and 12 patients completed 4 doses. Nine patients presented adverse events (AE) with two grade 3 AE (hepatic and cutaneous). All these patients recovered from the AE and completed the protocol. Toxicities observed corresponded mainly to immune-mediated effects. Five patients achieved stable disease, and 12 had progressive disease as the best response. The observed PFS of the 17 patients treated was 4.5 months, with an OS of 11.6 months.
Conclusions
TrimelVax presented an adequate safety profile in this trial. More studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of this therapy.
Clinical trial identification
NCT06556004.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Universidad de Chile.
Funding
Conicyt (Comisión Nacional de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica), Chile ANID, FONDAP 152220002.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract