Abstract 19P
Background
Triple-negaive breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly aggressive subtype with neoadjuvant options historically limited to chemotherapy until the recent success of the KEYNOTE-522 trial. Although TNBC is well known for being associated with constitutional pathogenic BRCA mutations when compared to other types of breast cancer, the genetic profiles of the patients in the KEYNOTE-522 trial are unknown and no subgroup analysis has assessed a possible relationship with treatment efficacy.
Methods
We analysed consecutive index-case genetic consults of TNBC patients (N = 170) between January 2020 and July 2024 in our oncogenetics department. Only patients with treatment history in our center were included. Tumor characteristics, pCR status and the type of chemotherapy agents used were collected. We compared the pCR and non pCR rates according to the genetic status and survival probability distribution stratified by the presence or not of Pembrolizumab and Carboplatin using Fisher’s exact test and the Kaplan-Meier method. A significance threshold of 5% was applied to all statistical analyses.
Results
A total of 132 patients were identified for the analysis. Significant benefits were observed in patients with pCR in terms of EFS (p = 0.001, HR = 0.07 CI 95% 0.02 – 0.21) and OS (p = 0.012, HR = 0.12 CI 95% 0.03 – 0.50), respectively. When comparing patients treated by a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen to those treated by pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, a significantly higher pCR rate was observed with the latter group (p = 0.01). Regarding the presence of pathogenic variants (PV), the following were identified: BRCA1 (N = 10), BRCA2 (N = 3), PALB 2 (N = 1), PMS2 (N = 1), RAD51C (N = 3) and RAD51D (N = 1). 30 patients carried various variants of unknown significance. Notably, all patients carrying a BRCA PV treated with pembrolizumab achieved pCR but results were not statistically significant (p = 0.14).
Conclusions
To our knowledge this is the first descriptive analysis of the genetic landscape of patients with an indication for neoadjuvant Pembrolizumab. Interestingly, all patients carrying pathogenic variants of BRCA treated with pembrolizumab had pCR although results were not statistically significant compared to patients not presenting BRCA PV.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
98P - Immuno-related cardiac toxicity: a prospective study applying multiparametric cardiac MRI
Presenter: Agnese Losurdo
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract