Abstract 125P
Background
Immunotherapy is vital for melanoma treatment, with tumor vaccines showing promise. Previous studies suggest circadian rhythms may impact immune responses, yet their effect on tumor vaccine efficacy is unclear. To optimize vaccine outcomes, we investigated the differences in melanoma treatment efficacy when vaccines were administered at different times, aiming to find the optimal therapeutic window.
Methods
We compared the efficacy of a neoantigen tumor vaccine developed by our team when administered during the active phase (ZT21) versus the rest phase (ZT9) in C57BL/6 mice with B16-F10 melanoma (ZT refers to Zeitgeber Time, where ZT0 is the time of lights on, and ZT12 is lights off). IVIS imaging was used to track vaccine targeting of lymph nodes at different time points. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR were performed to assess changes in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment, lymph nodes, and spleen post-vaccination.
Results
In a melanoma model, vaccine administration during the rest phase (ZT9) showed better tumor inhibition compared to the active phase (ZT21). IVIS results indicated faster lymph node targeting at ZT9. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry revealed that ZT9 administration increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, with a higher proportion of CD69+ T cells, leading to stronger anti-tumor immune responses.
Conclusions
Administering tumor vaccines during the rest phase, compared to the active phase, leads to faster lymph node targeting and stronger anti-tumor immune responses, resulting in better therapeutic outcomes. Thus, treatment timing should be considered in clinical immunotherapy, with vaccines administered during the rest phase for maximum clinical benefit.
Legal entity responsible for the study
West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Funding
Sichuan Science and Technology Program.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
21P - Impact of TP53 mutation subtypes on the efficacy of anti-PD-(L)1 immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer
Presenter: Lige Wu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
22P - Extracellular vesicles as predictive biomarkers for chemoimmunotherapy in biliary tract cancer
Presenter: Michele Zanoni
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
23P - Non-small cell lung cancer DNA methylation profiles correlate with immune checkpoint inhibitor response
Presenter: Julia Berger
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
24P - Blood DNA methylation profiles in NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Markus Kleinberger
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
25P - Circulating tumor DNA is predictive of overall survival in patients with metastatic uveal melanoma
Presenter: Egle Ramelyte
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
26P - Liquid biopsy-based percision immunotherapy: CCAT1 and HEIH lncRNAs identify young breast cancer patients likely to respond to PD-L1 blockade
Presenter: Rana Youness
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
27P - Single cell RNA sequencing (scRNAseq) analysis of peripheral immune cell populations from patients treated with anti-PD1 with recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (R/M SCCHN)
Presenter: Séverine Carlier
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
28P - Circulating biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Paola Ulivi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
29P - Prognostic value of systemic inflammatory index and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio in muscle-invasive bladder cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy in the AURA trial
Presenter: Jeremy Blanc
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
30P - The prognostic value of low density neutrophils in breast cancer: Implications for therapeutic strategies
Presenter: Telma Martins
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract