Abstract 125P
Background
Immunotherapy is vital for melanoma treatment, with tumor vaccines showing promise. Previous studies suggest circadian rhythms may impact immune responses, yet their effect on tumor vaccine efficacy is unclear. To optimize vaccine outcomes, we investigated the differences in melanoma treatment efficacy when vaccines were administered at different times, aiming to find the optimal therapeutic window.
Methods
We compared the efficacy of a neoantigen tumor vaccine developed by our team when administered during the active phase (ZT21) versus the rest phase (ZT9) in C57BL/6 mice with B16-F10 melanoma (ZT refers to Zeitgeber Time, where ZT0 is the time of lights on, and ZT12 is lights off). IVIS imaging was used to track vaccine targeting of lymph nodes at different time points. Flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and RT-PCR were performed to assess changes in CD8+ and CD4+ T cells in the tumor microenvironment, lymph nodes, and spleen post-vaccination.
Results
In a melanoma model, vaccine administration during the rest phase (ZT9) showed better tumor inhibition compared to the active phase (ZT21). IVIS results indicated faster lymph node targeting at ZT9. Flow cytometry and immunohistochemistry revealed that ZT9 administration increased tumor-infiltrating CD8+ and CD4+ T cells, with a higher proportion of CD69+ T cells, leading to stronger anti-tumor immune responses.
Conclusions
Administering tumor vaccines during the rest phase, compared to the active phase, leads to faster lymph node targeting and stronger anti-tumor immune responses, resulting in better therapeutic outcomes. Thus, treatment timing should be considered in clinical immunotherapy, with vaccines administered during the rest phase for maximum clinical benefit.
Legal entity responsible for the study
West China Hospital, Sichuan University.
Funding
Sichuan Science and Technology Program.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
146P - Neoadjuvant adebrelimab combined with chemotherapy for adenocarcinoma of esophagogastric junction: A single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical trial
Presenter: Jinqiang Liu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
147P - Serplulimab combined with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of resectable oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A single-arm phase II trial
Presenter: Zixiang Wu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
148P - Neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus metronomic chemotherapy in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinomas: A randomized phase II trial
Presenter: JIE LIU
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
149P - Toripalimab and chemotherapy as first line combination in advanced thymic carcinoma: A prospective, single-arm, phase II trial
Presenter: Kai Zhu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
150P - Interim results of the multicenter phase II study on induction pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer
Presenter: Tatiana Antonova
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
151P - Anti-tumor T cell response and immunoselection under combined GARP:TGF-?1/PD-1 blockade
Presenter: Grégoire de Streel
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
152P - TACTI-003 Cohort B: Eftilagimod alpha (Soluble LAG-3) and pembrolizumab in first-line recurrent or metastatic head & neck squamous cell carcinoma with PD-L1 negative
Presenter: Martin Forster
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
153P - Combination of Tim-3 blockade TQB2618 with PD-1 blockade for patients with immunotherapy-resistant recurrent/metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma (R/M NPC): Preliminary results from a phase II study
Presenter: Cheng Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
154P - Casdozokitug (casdozo, CHS-388), a first-in-class IL-27 antagonistic antibody, as monotherapy in treatment-refractory non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Aung Naing
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
155P - Tarlatamab for patients with small cell lung cancer: 6-8 hour outpatient vs 48 hour inpatient monitoring in cycle 1
Presenter: Anne Chiang
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract