Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

107P - Efficacy and safety of first-line TKI plus ICI therapy in metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: A real-world multiple-centre study

Date

12 Dec 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Yulu Peng

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 24 (suppl_1): 1-20. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100744

Authors

Y. Peng1, Z. Zhang2, M. Chen3, T. Jing4, J. Huang5, F. Zhou6, P. Dong2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Sun Yat Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou/CN
  • 2 Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou/CN
  • 3 Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha/CN
  • 4 The First Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine of Zhejiang University., Hangzhou/CN
  • 5 Renji Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai/CN
  • 6 Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou/CN

Resources

This content is available to ESMO members and event participants.

Abstract 107P

Background

Metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mnccRCC) currently lacks standard first-line treatment options. This study evaluated the effectiveness and safety of ICI plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in mnccRCC patients through multi-center real-world evidence, encompassing the largest sample size to date.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective analysis of treatment-naive metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mnccRCC) patients who received either TKI monotherapy or TKI + ICI combination therapy at four hospitals in China. Baseline characteristics were recorded, and comparisons were made between the two groups in terms of objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and the incidence of adverse events (AEs).

Results

A total of 214 mnccRCC patients were enrolled from the four hospitals: 122 in the TKI monotherapy group and 92 in the TKI + ICI combination group. The median follow-up time was 36.5 months (interquartile range [IQR], 24.2–57.0), with a median age of 49 years and a majority of male patients (70.6%). Compared to the TKI group, the TKI + ICI group showed a significantly higher objective response rate (29.4% vs. 16.4%, P < 0.01) and disease control rate (78.3% vs. 48.4%, P < 0.01). Additionally, the combination therapy group had a longer progression-free survival [median PFS (95% CI): 15.2 (6.6–23.7) months vs. 5.9 (4.3–7.5) months, P < 0.001] and a longer overall survival [median OS (95% CI): not reached vs. 38.5 (26.6–50.4) months, P = 0.019]. The incidence of grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events was slightly higher in the combination therapy group, but the difference was not statistically significant (35.8% vs. 23.7%, P = 0.079).

Conclusions

Our retrospective real-world study demonstrates that, compared to TKI monotherapy, the combination of ICI and TKI significantly improves progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and overall survival (OS) in patients with metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mnccRCC), with manageable safety. This study provides stronger evidence for the pharmacological treatment of metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.