Abstract 215P
Background
Immunotherapy (IO) using programmed cell death protein 1 inhibitors is the standard of care in recurrent/metastatic head and neck cancer (R/M HNSCC). While response rate is almost 20% in the total population, a small percentage of patients shows exceptional response. Here, spatial whole transcriptome data were analysed to investigate potential compartment-specific associations of RNA expression with exceptional response to (IO).
Methods
Prospectively collected pre-treatment biopsies and clinicopathologic data of 50 IO-treated patients with R/M HNSCC were included in the study. Exceptional response (ER) was defined as complete or partial response (RECIST 1.1), lasting longer than 3 times the median response duration found in literature for the same treatment setting. Samples were evaluated using the GeoMx Human Whole Transcriptome Atlas (NanoString) assay for the in-situ quantification of 18,677 genes in the tumor (CK), leukocyte (CD45) and macrophage (CD68) tissue compartments. Differentially expressed genes (P<0.05, FDR 0.05) between ER and non-ER cases were identified in each compartment. Immune cell genes extracted from the “Single Cell RNA-Seq HNSCC” (CIBERSORTx) gene matrix and clinicopathologic characteristics; smoking, alcohol, sex, age, primary site and PD-L1 status, were investigated for correlations with ER.
Results
Seven exceptional responders were identified. Five immunoglobulin (Ig) genes (IGHG1, IGHG2, IGHG3, IGHG4, IGLL5) and one B-cell related gene (MZB1) showed the highest expression for exceptional responders both in the CD45 and CD68 compartments (stroma). Follicular dendritic cell secreted protein gene (FDCSP) was highly expressed in tumor. There was no association of ER with the immune-cell phenotypes derived from CIBERSORTx deconvolution. Alcohol consumption was the only clinicopathologic characteristic that showed association with ER (P=0.047).
Conclusions
ER to IO in R/M HNSCC is characterized by increased expression of Ig and B-cell related genes in tumor and stroma, indicating the importance of secreted immune factors for durable IO responses.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
D. Rimm: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, Agendia, Cell Signaling Technology, Amgen, BMS, Cepheid, Danaher, Daiichi Sankyo, Genoptix/Novartis, Konica/Minolta, GSK, Merck, NanoString, PAIGE.AI, Perkin Elmer, Roche, Sanofi, Ventana; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Amgen, Cepheid, NavigateBP, NextCure, Konica/Minolta. A. Psyrri: Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: MSD, Merck Serono, EPICS; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Pfizer, Sanofi, MSD, AstraZeneca, BMS, Leo, Rakuten, eTheRNA immunotherapies, Merck Serono, Seagen, Merus, Merus Pharmaceuticals, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Local PI: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, GSK, Genesis, Incyte, Amgen, Debiopharm, MSD, Janssen, Lilly, Regeneron, Sanofi, BI, Roche, Peregrine, Oncolytics Biotech; Financial Interests, Personal, Coordinating PI: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Steering Committee Member: Iovance, Pfizer, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Steering Committee Member: Kura Oncology; Financial Interests, Personal, Steering Committee Member: Kura Oncology, GSK, Merus Pharmaceuticals; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Funding: Kura Oncology, BMS, Roche, DEMO, Amgen, BI, Genesis, BMS, Pfizer, Oncolytics Biotech; Financial Interests, Institutional, Funding: Merck Serono, Pfizer, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Educational activity: Medscape, Prime Oncology; Financial Interests, Institutional, Local PI: Novartis, Replimune. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract