Abstract 101P
Background
Blood vascular angiosarcoma is an uncommon and aggressive malignancy that has responded well to several combinations of immunotherapy. Conventional medicines like radiation and chemotherapy are not very successful, however immunotherapies such bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab, epacadostat + pembrolizumab, and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have shown positive outcomes in certain individuals. Ipilimumab + nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have also demonstrated promise in slowing the course of the illness and raising survival rates.
Methods
This study was conducted based on PRISMA reporting guidelines. All included studies were derived from PubMed, Sciencedirect, NEJM, and Europe PMC databases using a set of keywords: Angiosarcoma, Pembrolizumab, and Immunotherapies. Studies were extracted and evaluated based on inclusion (Accessible full text, Randomized Controlled Trial, Clinical Trials, and last 5 years) and exclusion criterias (non-english text, animal studies, case report, systematic reviews, and meta analysis) The quality of included studies were further assessed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS).
Results
Seven studies consisting of RCTs and clinical trials were included, screening a total of 195 patients. Among the seven studies, bempegaldesleukin + nivolumab yields 0.60 (95% Cl; 0.08-4.40; P < 0.00001), epacadostat + pembrolizumab yields 0.03 (95% Cl; 0.00-0.29; P < 0.00001), ipilimumab + nivolumab yields 0.33 (95% Cl; 0.07-1.49; P < 0.00001), pembrolizumab alone yields 3.33 (95% Cl; 0.36-30.70; P < 0.00001), and Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) yields 0.13 (95% Cl; 0.02-0.71; P < 0.00001) Adverse effect wise is 17.00 (95% Cl; 0.74-391.68; P < 0.00001), 0.30 (95% Cl; 0.10-0.92; P < 0.00001), 3.00 (95% Cl; 0.67-13.40; P < 0.00001), 0.09 (95% Cl; 0.00-2.07; P < 0.00001), and 5.00 (95% Cl; 1.07-23.46; P < 0.00001), respectively.
Conclusions
This research shows that monotherapy drugs, pembrolizumab alone, are better than other combinations and ICIs in terms of ORR and adverse effect.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Enzo Marson.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract