Abstract 96P
Background
Immune checkpoint inhibitors, particularly PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors, have revolutionized cancer treatment by enhancing the immune system's ability to target tumors. However, their use has been associated with immune-related adverse events, including cardiotoxicity. This meta-analysis aims to compare the cardiovascular risks associated with PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors, focusing on the incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity.
Methods
A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for studies published from January 2010 to December 2023. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials and observational studies reporting cardiovascular adverse events in patients treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Data on the incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity were extracted and analyzed using a random-effects model. The primary endpoints were the overall incidence of cardiotoxicity and severe (Grade 3-4) cardiotoxic events.
Results
A total of 25 studies involving 12,345 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled incidence of cardiotoxicity was 5.2% (95% CI: 4.1%-6.3%) for PD-1 inhibitors and 4.3% (95% CI: 3.4%-5.2%) for PD-L1 inhibitors. Severe cardiotoxic events occurred in 1.5% (95% CI: 1.1%-1.9%) of patients receiving PD-1 inhibitors and 1.2% (95% CI: 0.8%-1.6%) of those receiving PD-L1 inhibitors. The relative risk (RR) of overall cardiotoxicity for PD-1 versus PD-L1 inhibitors was 1.21 (95% CI: 0.97-1.50, p=0.09), and the RR for severe cardiotoxicity was 1.25 (95% CI: 0.87-1.79, p=0.21), indicating no statistically significant difference between the two groups.
Conclusions
This meta-analysis indicates that PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors have comparable cardiovascular risk profiles in terms of both incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity. While PD-1 inhibitors showed a slightly higher incidence of cardiotoxic events, the differences were not statistically significant. Clinicians should remain vigilant for cardiotoxicity in patients receiving either class of immune checkpoint inhibitors and manage cardiovascular risks accordingly.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
168TiP - A phase I dose escalation/expansion study of GSK5764227 (GSK’227), a B7-homolog 3 (B7-H3) protein targeted antibody-drug conjugate (ADC), in patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Giuseppe Curigliano
Session: Poster Display session
169TiP - Colorectal carcinoma: Low dose immunotherapy in upfront metastatic d/MMR patients (CLOUD study)
Presenter: Anant Ramaswamy
Session: Poster Display session
177P - Ubiquitous neoantigens as targets for T cell recognition in a patient with metastatic pancreatic neuroendocrine tumour
Presenter: Jean-Benoit Tanis
Session: Poster Display session
178P - Comprehensive immunophenotype analysis in anti-PD-1 antibody sensitive and resistant syngeneic mouse model unravels perforin-expressing CD4+T cells dominant cytolytic activity
Presenter: Hiroyuki Inoue
Session: Poster Display session
179P - Impact of exercise training on tumour-infiltrating T cells in human prostate cancer
Presenter: Louise Lehrskov
Session: Poster Display session
180P - Chronic circadian disruption promotes melanoma progression by interfering with NK cells
Presenter: Shuwen Xiao
Session: Poster Display session
181P - Intratumoral heterogeneity of immune infiltrate in leiomyosarcomas
Presenter: Iva Benesova
Session: Poster Display session
182P - Innovative nano-immunotherapy for modulating tumor-immune interactions and microbiome in pancreatic cancer
Presenter: Liane Moura
Session: Poster Display session
183P - CAIX negatively modulates inflammatory and anti-tumor immune responses
Presenter: Eliska Svastova
Session: Poster Display session
184P - Alterations in tumorigenicity and immunogenicity of bladder cancer cells after somatic cell reprogramming
Presenter: Banu Iskender Izgi
Session: Poster Display session