Abstract 169TiP
Background
Patients with microsatellite instability (MSI) solid tumors are equisitely sensitive to immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The pharmacokinetics data as well as early efficacy data have shown that low dose- ICIs (LD-ICIs) may have similar efficacy to standard dose in MSI solid tumors. While standard dose pembrolizumab as well as the combination of nivolumab and ipililumab are effective therapeutic options in advanced colorectal cancers (mCRC), it may not be feasible in a majority of patients in low income countries (LICs) and lower middle income countries (LMICs). With this background, the current study aims to evaluate the efficacy of LD-Nivolumab in mCRC.
Trial Design
The CLOUD study is planned as a single-arm, open-label, prospective, phase 2 superiority study. Adults aged >= 18 years with adequate end-organ function and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) 0-1 diagnosed with treatment naïve unresectable or metastatic colorectal adenocarcinoma (patients could have received previous adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer if the earlier treatment had been completed at least 6 months before enrolement) with MSI status (on Polymerase Chain reaction or Next Generation Sequencing) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) protein status on biopsy will be considered for enrolment. Accrued patients will receive nivolumab 40 mg IV every 3 weekly for 6 months and then 6 weekly for next 6 months (maximum of 12 months or till disease progression, whichever is earlier). The study is planned in two stages. The null hypothesis is that the true progression free survival is 35% at 12 months with chemotherapy, which will be tested against a one-sided alternative. In the first stage, 20 patients will be accrued, and if there are 7 or fewer patients who are progression free at 12 months in these 20 patients, the study will be stopped. Otherwise, 27 additional patients will be accrued for a total of 47 patients. The null hypothesis will be rejected if 21 or more have progressed within 12 months in the entire cohort. This design yields a type I error rate of 0.1 and power of 90 when the progression free survival at 12 months is 55%. Assuming a loss to follow up or attrition rate of 10%, the total sample size of the study 52 patients.
Clinical trial identification
CTRI/2024/01/061681, Registered on: 22/01/2024.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Tata Memorial Hospital.
Funding
TMC Research Administration Council (TRAC), Tata Memorial Centre.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
88P - Utilisation of the ESMO-MCBS in prioritising immune-checkpoint inhibitors for a WHO model list of essential medicines application
Presenter: Mario Csenar
Session: Poster Display session
89P - Safety and efficacy of rechallenge with immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced solid tumor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Presenter: Huijun Xu
Session: Poster Display session
90P - Meta-analysis of hypophysitis incidence in melanoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors
Presenter: Vincas Urbonas
Session: Poster Display session
91P - Territorial disparities in the use of hospitalization at home for immune checkpoint inhibitors infusion in France between 2021 and 2022
Presenter: Anne Claire Toffart
Session: Poster Display session
92P - An investigation on the differences between the pre-treatment nutritional and immunological status of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and the healthy population
Presenter: Qiao He
Session: Poster Display session
93P - Pseudoprogression in immunotherapy: Illusion or reality? P-PIT study
Presenter: Amelie Toulet
Session: Poster Display session
94P - Real-world characteristics, treatments and healthcare recourse utilization (HCRU) of patients (pts) with advanced/metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) managed with first line (1L) immuno-oncology (IO) strategies in Greece: The IO-HORIZON study
Presenter: Dimitrios Ziogas
Session: Poster Display session
95P - Quality of life (QoL) and care pathway in patients with durable response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI-DR) for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or melanoma: QUALICI study
Presenter: Nicolas Girard
Session: Poster Display session
96P - Comparative cardiovascular risks of PD-1 vs. PD-L1 inhibitors: A meta-analysis of incidence and severity of cardiotoxicity
Presenter: Mohammedbaqer Al-Ghuraibawi
Session: Poster Display session
Resources:
Abstract
97P - Cardiac risk stratification and serial monitoring during immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: Prospective real-world experience
Presenter: James Knott
Session: Poster Display session