Abstract 52P
Background
Lung cancer's multiple resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors is inexorable and often unexplained in many NSLCs with EGFR mutations or other oncogenes and epigenetic changes. This suggests the need for new treatment strategies.
Methods
We generated second-generation CD28-costimulated EGFR-specific CAR constructs using lentiviral vectors to modify NK92 cells. We evaluated the utility of NK92 cells expressing a CAR-EGFR against TKI-resistant lung cancer cells at a low effector-to-target ratio to allow possible escape or evolution of select lung cancer cells. EGFR expression was analyzed by flow cytometry.
Results
We evaluated the utility of NK92 cells expressing a CAR-EGFR against TKI-resistant lung cancer cells. Our approach used a low effector-to-target ratio to allow possible escape or evolution of select lung cancer cells. We found that Gefitinib-resistant lung cancer cells HCC827GR6 and TKI-sensitive HCC827 are equally attacked by NK92 cells. However, TKI-resistant HCC827GR6 were more sensitive to EGFR-CAR NK cell attacks than parental HCC827. Predictably, EGFR-CAR NK cell attacks led to reduced EGFR expression in HCC827 and growth without increasing resistance to naïve NK92 attacks. However, the EGFR-CAR NK cell attack caused an increase in EGFR expression in gefitinib-resistant HCC827GR6 cells with a slight reduction in growth. This paradoxical increased EGFR protein expression suggests a positive selection of mutant EGFR, reducing their chance of escaping new EGFR-CAR NK cell attacks. Indeed, in co-culture experiments of TKI-sensitive and TKI-resistant cells, the latter were more efficiently eliminated, suggesting the preferential killing of TKI-resistant lung cancer cells by EGFR-CAR NK.
Conclusions
Our data indicate that TKI-resistant lung cancer cells, which evolved to depend on the expression of a mutated EGFR, are targeted more efficiently by EGFR-CAR NK cells than TKI-sensitive cells.
Legal entity responsible for the study
Sumei Chen and Youssef Jounaidi.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
35P - Peripheral immunotype classification for monitoring Soft Tissue Sarcoma patients
Presenter: Jani Sofia Almeida
Session: Poster Display
36P - Expression of germinal center B cell- and Th17 cell-related transcripts are prognostic of soft-tissue sarcoma patient outcomes
Presenter: Giulia Petroni
Session: Poster Display
38P - Machine learning-based pathomics model to predict the infiltration of Treg and prognosis in IDH-wt GBM
Presenter: Shaoli Peng
Session: Poster Display
40P - The role of low avidity tumour-specific CD8+ T cells in immunotherapeutic response to anti-PD-1
Presenter: Doreen Lau
Session: Poster Display
41P - Contrasting drivers of response to immunotherapy across solid tumour types: results from analysis of >2500 cases
Presenter: Danwen Qian
Session: Poster Display
42P - TCCIA: A Comprehensive Resource for Exploring CircRNA in Cancer Immunotherapy
Presenter: Jian-Guo Zhou
Session: Poster Display
43P - Immune and tumor cells expression of VISTA in a panel of cancer indications: A strategy to inform selection of patients treated with anti-VISTA
Presenter: Pierre Launay
Session: Poster Display
44P - Exploratory Analysis of Peripheral Pharmacodynamic (PD) Biomarkers After Sitravatinib (Sitra) and Tislelizumab (TIS) in Advanced Solid Tumors: SAFFRON-103
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Poster Display
45P - Protein biomarkers associated with organ-specific immune-related toxicity and response to management identified by proteome analysis of extracellular vesicles from plasma
Presenter: Anders Kverneland
Session: Poster Display