Abstract 92P
Background
Systemic therapy combined with transarterial-based therapy has demonstrated promising results for unresectable HCC. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (“T+A”) is the standard first-line therapeutic regimen for advanced HCC, while lenvatinb combined programmed death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors shows synergistic anti-tumor effect as well. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors versus TAE-HAIC plus “T+A” for unresectable HCC.
Methods
In this retrospective study, treatment-naïve unresectable HCC patients who were treated with TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors (THLP group) or TAE-HAIC plus “T+A” (THTA group) were included. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response according to modified RECIST, and adverse events (AEs). We performed propensity score matching (PSM) approaches to reduce bias between two groups.
Results
From June 2020 to June 2023, 339 patients were enrolled in this study: 233 in the THLP group and 106 in the THTA group. After PSM with a ratio of 3:1, 153 and 51 patients were assigned to the THLP and THAT group, respectively. The THLP group showed a longer median OS (21.3 versus 18.2 months; P = 0.486), while median PFS was longer in the THTA group (6.8 versus 6.3 months; P = 0.552), both without statistical differences. There were no statistical differences in objective response rate (ORR) (73.3% versus 68.3%; P =0.635) and disease control rate (DCR) (91.7% versus 89.3%; P =0.716) neither. No significant difference in the rate of the grade 3/4 AEs was observed between the two groups, and all AEs were controllable. No treatment-related grade 5 AE took place in the two groups.
Conclusions
TAE-HAIC plus lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors or TAE-HAIC plus “T+A” demonstrated similar outcomes for unresectable HCC with acceptable toxic effects, which needs to be validated with larger-scale randomized clinical trials.
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
101P - Progression-Free Survival is an acceptable surrogate endpoint for chemo-immunotherapy combinations in Cervical Carcinoma, an EORTC Young GCG study
Presenter: Ramon Yarza
Session: Poster Display
102P - Interim safety analysis of a phase 2 trial of cisplatin-sensitized radiation therapy and pembrolizumab for unresectable vulvar cancer
Presenter: Oladapo Yeku
Session: Poster Display
103P - Long-term survivorship rates among previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) achieving objective response with nivolumab
Presenter: Saby George
Session: Poster Display
105P - Preliminary efficacy and safety results from ‘ReBirth’, a phase II study of risk-based bladder-sparing therapy for MIBC.
Presenter: Yijun Shen
Session: Poster Display
106P - Treatment Sequencing in PD-L1-Positive Recurrent/Metastatic (R/M) Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC): Exploratory Analysis of the Phase 3 KEYNOTE-048 Study
Presenter: Amanda Psyrri
Session: Poster Display
108P - Real-world (RW) effectiveness and safety of adjuvant nivolumab (NIVO) in patients (pts) with melanoma in Belgium and Luxembourg: PRESERV MEL
Presenter: Bart Neyns
Session: Poster Display
109P - Prognosis of patients with metastatic melanoma with initial stable disease during treatment with anti-PD-1 monotherapy
Presenter: Inge Noringriis
Session: Poster Display
110P - Outcomes of CUPem: A prospective Phase II multicentre clinical Trial of Pembrolizumab in patients with pre-treated Cancer of Unknown Primary
Presenter: Harpreet Wasan
Session: Poster Display
111P - Characteristics and outcomes of immunotherapy-related liver injury in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma compared to patients with advanced solid tumours
Presenter: Ciro Celsa
Session: Poster Display