Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display

143P - Efficacy and safety of bronchial arterial chemoembolization (BACE) in combination with tislelizumab for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A single-arm phase II trial

Date

08 Dec 2022

Session

Poster Display

Presenters

Xuhua Duan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2022) 16 (suppl_1): 100104-100104. 10.1016/iotech/iotech100104

Authors

X. Duan, H. Li, D. Kuang, M. Zhang, W. Xu, C. Liang, J. Wang, J. Ren

Author affiliations

  • The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 143P

Background

Immunotherapy and BACE are important therapy for NSCLC. This trial is designed to determine the efficacy and safety of immunotherapy with tislelizumab in addition to BACE in stage III-IV NSCLC patients (pts) who failed, refused or ineligible to receive standard treatments.

Methods

This trial enrolled stage III-IV pts without EGFR, ALK or ROS1 aberrations who have failed, refused, or assessed ineligible to receive conventional treatments (surgery, chemoradiotherapy, chemotherapy). Pts were treated with BACE and tislelizumab as induction therapy during which BACE was performed on the first day and tislelizumab was given 3-5 days later, then tislelizumab was administered at 200mg Q3W as maintenance therapy. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS) and safety, etc. Herein, the treatment response at 6 weeks is reported.

Results

30 pts were enrolled with 24 (80%) males pts and a median age of 65.1y; 21 (70%) squamous, 9 (30%) adenocarcinomas; 4 (13%) stage IIIA, 11 (37%) stage IIIB, 15 (50%) stage IV; 8 (27%) with ECOG score 0, 17 (57%) with score 1, and 5(17%) with score 2. Among the 30 pts, 5 (17%) pts had bronchial stenosis, 2 (7%) had superior vena cava syndrome, 8 (27%) had pneumonia, 4 (13%) had pulmonary heart disease, and 4 (13%) had hemoptysis. The ORR and DCR were 66.7% and 83.3% respectively per RECIST1.1, 2 pts (6.7%) achieved complete response (CR), 18 pts (60.0%) and 5 pts (16.7%) got partial response (PR) and stable disease (SD). The main TEAEs related to BACE mainly include nausea (20.0%, 6/30), fever (16.7%, 5/30), hemoglobin decrease (6.7%, 2/30), leukopenia (10.0%, 3/30) and thrombocytopenia (6.7%, 2/30). TEAEs related to tislelizumab mainly included fatigue (6.7%, 2/30),rash (10.0%, 3/30) and cough (10.0%, 3/30). Grade≥3 AEs were not observed.

Conclusions

Tislelizumab combined with BACE for advanced NSCLC pts appears to be safe and feasible, and the comorbidities of patients can be alleviated after treatment. Compared with previous studies on BACE, the addition of immunotherapy may improve the ORR and DCR.

Clinical trial identification

NCT05286957.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hennan Medical Information Society.

Funding

BeiGene.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.