Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

44P - Real-world overall survival in second-line maintenance niraparib monotherapy vs active surveillance in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer

Date

23 Feb 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Kathleen Moore

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_1): 100811-100811. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100811

Authors

K.N. Moore1, J. Perhanidis2, L. Kalilani3, N. Zimmerman4, A. Golembesky3, R.L. Coleman5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Stephenson Cancer Center/University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City/US
  • 2 GSK, Waltham/US
  • 3 GSK, Durham/US
  • 4 GSK, Upper Providence/US
  • 5 US Oncology Research, The Woodlands/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 44P

Background

NOVA was a randomized Phase 3 trial assessing the efficacy of niraparib maintenance for patients (pts) with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer (OC); overall survival (OS) was the secondary endpoint. The aim of this real-world (RW) study was to compare OS in BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt) pts with recurrent OC receiving second-line maintenance (2Lm) niraparib monotherapy or active surveillance (AS) to complement NOVA trial results.

Methods

This study used the US nationwide Flatiron Health de-identified electronic health record-derived database. Pts diagnosed with epithelial OC from 1 Jan 2011–31 May 2021 and completed 2L therapy from 1 Jan 2017–2 Mar 2022 were eligible for inclusion. Pts were assigned to niraparib 2Lm or AS cohorts according to their treatment scenario after end of 2L therapy (≤120 days). Follow-up was measured from index date (end of 2L non-maintenance therapy) until end of study (31 May 2022), last activity or death, whichever came first. A target trial emulation cloned inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) methodology was selected a priori to minimize bias. IPCW median OS and hazard ratios (HR) for 2Lm vs AS were estimated with Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression models.

Results

Overall, 199 and 707 BRCAwt pts received niraparib 2Lm or were under AS, respectively. Most pt characteristics were similar across cohorts. Median follow-up was 15.6 and 9.3 months, and median OS was 24.1 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.9, 29.5) and 18.4 (95% CI: 15.1, 22.8) months for niraparib 2Lm and AS cohorts, respectively (HR: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.66, 0.89]). Table: 44P

Patient characteristics and follow-up before adjustment

2Lm (N=199) 2L AS (N=707)
Characteristics, n (%)
Age
   18–74 146 (73) 498 (70)
   ≥75 53 (27) 209 (30)
Race
   White 132 (66) 508 (72)
   Black 9 (5) 42 (6)
   Other 52 (26) 115 (16)
   NR 6 (3) 42 (6)
Practice type
   Community 168 (84) 574 (81)
   Academic 18 (9) 118 (17)
   Both 13 (7) 15 (2)
Histology
   Serous 156 (78) 545 (77)
   Other 20 (10) 68 (10)
   NR 23 (12) 94 (13)
ECOG
   0–1 167 (84) 505 (71)
   2–4 18 (9) 93 (13)
   NR 14 (7) 109 (15)
Stage
   I–II 21 (11) 77 (11)
   III 103 (52) 353 (50)
   IV 56 (28) 203 (29)
   NR 19 (10) 74 (10)
HRD
   HRd 10 (5) 38 (5)
   HRp 7 (4) 56 (8)
   NR 182 (91) 613 (87)
Median follow-up, months (quartile 1, quartile 2) 15.6 (9.1, 27.1) 9.3 (3.2, 21.0)

HRp, HR proficient; NR, not reported

Conclusions

This RW study provides supportive evidence of niraparib's OS benefit in BRCAwt pts in the 2Lm setting. Homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) testing in the RW is limited and prevented examination of BRCAwt + HR deficient (HRd) subgroup.

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support provided by Claire Kelly, Fishawack Health, funded by GSK.

Legal entity responsible for the study

GSK.

Funding

GSK (study 219306).

Disclosure

K.N. Moore: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: Aravive, AstraZeneca, Alkermes, Addi, Blueprint Pharma, Clovis, Elevar, Eisai, Genentech/Roche, GSK, Hengrui, ImmunoGen, Imab, Mersana, Myriad, Novartis, Mereo, OncXerna, OncoNova, Verastem, Sorrento, VBL Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Role: Merck, Lilly; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Research Grant: Merck, Lilly; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: PTC Therapeutics; Financial Interests, Personal, Member of the Board of Directors: Gynecologic Oncology Group F; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Associate Director: Gynecologic Oncology Group Partners; Financial Interests, Personal, Research Grant: Verastem. J. Perhanidis: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GSK. L. Kalilani: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GSK. N. Zimmerman: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: GSK. A. Golembesky: Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment: GSK. R.L. Coleman: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Janssen, Merck, Roche/Genentech, Arrivive, Eisai, Novocure, Oncomed/Mateo, OncoQuest, OncoSec, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal and Institutional, Advisory Role: AbbVie; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Genmab, V-Foundation.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.