Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

20P - Randomized Comparison of four Radiotherapy schedules in locally advanced cervical cancer: A Prospective study

Date

23 Feb 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

SUNIL CHOUDHARY

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_1): 100863-100863. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100863

Authors

S. CHOUDHARY1, A. Singh2, R. Kumar2, L. Aggrawal2, A. Verma2, A. Mourya2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,IMS-BHU, 221005 - Varanasi/IN
  • 2 Institute of Medical Sciences, Banaras Hindu University,IMS-BHU, Varanasi/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 20P

Background

The study was conducted with the aim to compare four radiotherapy schedules in terms of overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), acute & late toxicities in locally advanced cervical cancer.

Methods

A total of 73 patients (ECOG 0-1) with histologically proven cervical cancer, FIGO stage IIB-IVA were included in the study (December 2020 to July 2022). All the patients were treated with 6 MV Linear Accelerator with Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the whole pelvis. This was followed by High dose rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) with intracavitary (ICRT) or interstitial (ISBT) application. Patients were randomized into four treatment arms: Arm A- EBRT: 45 Gy/ 25 fractions/ 5 weeks; ISBT: 6 Gy / fraction, 4 fractions, twice daily. Arm B- EBRT: 50 Gy/ 25 fractions/ 5 weeks; ISBT: 6 Gy / fraction, 4 fractions, twice daily. Arm C- EBRT: 45 Gy/ 25 fractions/ 5 weeks; ICRT: 7 Gy / fraction, 4 fractions, weekly. Arm D- EBRT: 45 Gy/ 25 fractions/ 5 weeks; ICRT: 7 Gy / fraction, 3 fractions, weekly. Positive lymph nodes were treated with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) of 55 Gy in 25 fractions and concurrent cisplatin at 40mg/m2 in all four arms. The patients were contoured and planned on CT based planning system. Response assessment was done with functional MRI after completion of EBRT & after 3 months of treatment completion.

Results

The median follow-up of the study was 19.4 months. The mean OS in arms A, B, C & D was 32.3, 15.7, 15.3 & 34.5 months respectively (p= 0.954). The mean DFS in arms A, B, C & D was 31.9, 11.9, 11.0, and 28.8 months respectively (p= 0.562). Grade 3/4 acute hematological toxicity was seen in arm A (18.2%), C (5.6%) & D (17.3%). Grade 3/4 GI toxicity was present in arms C (5.6%) & D (13%). Radiation proctitis was significantly more in the arm A & B (p=0.007).

Conclusions

All the treatment arms were similar in survival outcomes and acute toxicities. However, radiation proctitis was significantly more in patients receiving ISBT.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.