Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

19P - Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery vs chemoradiotherapy in patients with cervical cancer (stage IIB, FIGO 2018)

Date

23 Feb 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Abror Abdujapparov

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_1): 100863-100863. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100863

Authors

A.S. Abdujapparov1, F.M. Djuraev2, N.O. Zaynutdinov3

Author affiliations

  • 1 Tashkent city branch of the republican specialized scientific and practical medical center of, Tashkent/UZ
  • 2 Tashkent Medical Academy, 100109 - Tashkent/UZ
  • 3 Tashkent city branch of the republican specialized scientific and practical medical center of oncology and radiology, Tashkent/UZ

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 19P

Background

Improving the results of treatment of patients with stage IIB cervical cancer by introducing the most effective, less toxic chemoradiotherapy at one of the phases of complex or combined treatment.

Methods

This study based on a prospective analysis of 215 women diagnosed with stage IIB cervical cancer. The median age was 47 years (28-64). The patients were divided into two groups: the NACT+S group, 105 patients who recive 2-3 cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (paclitaxel+carboplatin) followed by surgical treatment. Radiotherapy (1,8 Gy, 45 Gy ± SIB on the metastatically involved lymph nodes 2,2 Gy, 55 Gy) was performed 1-2 months after surgical treatment. Patients also received cycles of cisplatin (40 mg/m2), administered once every week. The second group (CRT group) included 110 patients who underwent radiotherapy (regime was same with NACT+S = 1,8 Gy, 45 Gy ± SIB 2,2 Gy, 55 Gy). Brachytherapy was performed for all patients (6 Gy x 5 fr, to point A 30 Gy).

Results

The median follow-up was 23 months (8-38). In the NACT+S group, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia of the 3 - 4 degree were more common than in the CRT group (6.6% and 7.6% vs. 0.9% and 0.9%, respectively; p = 0.026; p = 0.015). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups studied in relation to the 3 - 4 degree of radiation toxicity of the GI and genitourinary system. 26 cases of disease progression (24.8%) occurred in the NACT+S group, and 15 events (13.6%) occurred in the CRT group; the corresponding 3-year DFS rates were 75.2% and 86.4%, respectively (HR 1.83; 95% CI 1.99-3.40; p = 0.05). Nineteen patients (18.1%) died in the NACT+S group, and 18 patients (15.5%) died in the CRT group, with corresponding 3-year indicators of OS was 81.9% and 84.5%, respectively (HR 1.11; 95% CI from 0.58 to 2.14; p = 0.736).

Conclusions

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation resulted in superior DFS compared with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical surgery in locally advanced cervical cancer. In the NACT+S group, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia grade 3 or 4 at a higher rate than in the concomitant CRT group. Despite this, there was no significant difference between the two study groups with 3-year indicators of OS and respect to grade 3 or 4 GI and bladder toxicities.

Legal entity responsible for the study

A.S. Abdujapparov.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.