Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

26P - Demographics and survival outcomes in patients (pts) with advanced or recurrent (A/R) endometrial cancer (EC) in the English real-world (RW) setting

Date

23 Feb 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Alvaro Ingles Russo Garces

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_1): 100792-100792. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100792

Authors

A.H. Ingles Russo Garces1, K. Heffernan2, J. Garside2, T. Rahman3, C. Pearson3, S. Banerjee4

Author affiliations

  • 1 The Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Sutton/GB
  • 2 Brentford, Middlesex/GB
  • 3 Capital Park, Fulbourn, Cambridge/GB
  • 4 The Royal Marsden Hospital - Chelsea, London/GB

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 26P

Background

There is limited evidence of RW outcomes for pts with A/R EC. This descriptive, noninterventional, retrospective study reports RW pt characteristics and survival outcomes in a cohort of pts with A/R EC in England who received first-line (1L) therapy and could have been eligible for a clinical trial of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in EC.

Methods

This study used routine population-level data, available through the National Disease Registration Service in England. Pts diagnosed with A/R EC (recurrences identified via a defined algorithm) between 1 Jan 2013 and 31 Dec 2019 were included (follow-up until 23 Aug 2021). Patients in the ICI cohort had received any 1L therapy for A/R EC and met the key eligibility criteria of the RUBY trial (A Study to Evaluate Dostarlimab Plus Carboplatin-paclitaxel Versus Placebo Plus Carboplatin-paclitaxel in Participants With Recurrent or Primary Advanced Endometrial Cancer; NCT03981796). Demographics, baseline characteristics, and therapy received were reported. Overall survival (OS), time to next treatment (TTNT; a proxy for progression-free survival), and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) from 1L chemotherapy initiation (index date) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methodology.

Results

Of 9629 identified pts with A/R EC who received any 1L therapy, 24.7% (N=2376) were in the ICI cohort (demographics in table). Median TTNT, median TTD, and median OS in months from 1L chemotherapy initiation were 16.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 15.8–18.5), 3.4 (95% CI: 3.4–3.4), and 27.2 (95% CI: 24.7–30.2), respectively. Table: 26P

Characteristic N=2376
Median age, years (range) 67.9 (26.7–94.0)
Disease stage at primary diagnosis, n (%)
FIGO I/II 401 (16.9)
FIGO III/IV 1975 (83.1)
Histology, n (%)
Endometrioid 1049 (44.1)
Serous 667 (28.1)
Carcinosarcoma 309 (13.0)
Nonspecific carcinoma 105 (4.4)
Clear cell carcinoma 103 (4.3)
Other 143 (6.0)
1L systemic anticancer therapy received, n (%)
Carboplatin+paclitaxel 1824 (77.8)
Carboplatin 302 (12.9)
Cisplatin 49 (2.1)
Doxorubicin 16 (0.7)
Other 154 (6.6)
None 31 (1.3)

Conclusions

This RW study in England demonstrates that 1L survival outcomes are poor for pts with A/R EC who received 1L therapy, highlighting the critical unmet need for more effective therapies to delay EC relapse and prolong pt survival.

Clinical trial identification

OneCDP218291.

Editorial acknowledgement

Editorial support provided by Hayley Butler, PhD, of Fishawack Health, funded by GSK.

Legal entity responsible for the study

GSK.

Funding

Study funded by GSK (OneCDP218291).

Disclosure

K. Heffernan: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employee: GSK. J. Garside: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employee: GSK. T. Rahman: Other, Personal, Other, Data Scientist: Health Data Insight CIC. C. Pearson: Other, Personal, Other, Senior Health Data Analyst: Health Data Insight CIC. S. Banerjee: Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Employee: GSK; Financial Interests, Institutional, Other, Research grants: AstraZeneca, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Advisory boards: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Epsilogen, GSK, Immunogen, Merck Sharpe Dohme, Merck Sereno, Mersana, Novartis, Oncxerna, Regeneron, Seagen, Shattuck Labs; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Honoraria for lectures: Amgen, AstraZeneca, Clovis, GSK, Immunogen, Merck Sharpe Dohme, Mersana, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.