Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

50P - Can We Learn From Failures? A Systematic Review and Metanalysis of Phase III Trials in Platinum Resistant Ovarian Cancer

Date

23 Feb 2023

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Federica Martorana

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2023) 8 (1suppl_1): 100811-100811. 10.1016/esmoop/esmoop100811

Authors

F. Martorana1, C. Sessa2, S. Lheureux3, I. Colombo4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Azienda Policlinico Università di Catania, Catania/IT
  • 2 EOC - Ospedale Regionale Bellinzona e Valli - Istituto Oncologico della Svizzera Italiana (IOSI), Bellinzona/CH
  • 3 University Health Network - Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto/CA
  • 4 EOC - Ospedale Regionale di Bellinzona e Valli, San Giovanni, Bellinzona/CH

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 50P

Background

Despite considerable efforts, little advances have been made in the treatment of platinum resistant ovarian cancer (PROC) in the last decade. The reasons for these dismal results remain controversial. Understanding phase (Ph) 3 randomized controlled trials (RCT) design and outcomes in PROC patients might provide indications for the development of future research.

Methods

We performed a systematic review searching in PubMed, Embase and CENTRAL for Ph3 RCT enrolling PROC patients, published between 2010 and 2022. For the meta-analysis, effect sizes (ES) for progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated using random-effect models with restricted maximum likelihood estimate.

Results

After screening and eligibility assessment, 15 records reporting the results of 13 RCT were included, for a total of 4606 patients. Experimental arm employed targeted agents in 6 trials, chemotherapy (Cht) in 4, immunotherapy in 2 and antibody-drug conjugate in 1. Control treatment was Cht in all studies. Only 3 trials included a biomarker-selected population. PFS and/or OS were the (co-)primary endpoints in all studies but one. Median PFS ranged from 1.9 to 6.7 months (m) in the experimental arms and from 1.2 to 5.7 m in the control arms; median OS ranged from 8.8 to 16.6 m in experimental arms and from 8.4 to 22.2 m in the control arms. All but two trials (TRINOVA1 and AURELIA) failed to show any PFS benefit in PROC patients and none had positive OS results. Overall ES for PFS was -0.03 (95% CI -0.23, 0.16), with high heterogeneity (I283.3%) while ES for OS was -0.02 (95% CI -0.10, 0.05) with negligible heterogeneity (I2<0.0001). Of the included Ph3 RCT, 6 were preceded by a single arm and 3 by a randomized Ph2 study.

Conclusions

The two RCT testing the anti-angiogenic agents bevacizumab and trebananib combined with Cht were the only reporting a PFS benefit in PROC. The lack of robust predictive biomarkers, of adequate preclinical and early clinical results and of a proper methodology might partly explain these disappointing outcomes. A better understanding of PROC biology and its implementation in study design are crucial to improve drug development in this population.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

F. Martorana: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, travel grant: Roche, Gilead; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Istituto Gentili; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: Amgen. C. Sessa: Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Coordinator Gynecological Programme: ESO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, ESMO extended member women for oncology: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Member of the compliance committee: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role, editor of living clinical practice guidelines: ESMO; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Role, Medical advisor for innovation, institutional interest: Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK). S. Lheureux: Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: AstraZeneca, GSK, Eisai, Merck, Novartis; Financial Interests, Personal, Invited Speaker: GSK, Roche; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant, Academic trial: GSK; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: Repare Therapeutics, Merck, AstraZeneca, Regeneron, GSK, Roche, Seagen; Financial Interests, Institutional, Research Grant: Roche. I. Colombo: Financial Interests, Personal, Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca, GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Other, Travel grants: Tesaro; Financial Interests, Institutional, Expert Testimony: AstraZeneca; Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: GSK; Financial Interests, Personal, Advisory Board: MSD; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, My husband was a Medtronic employee until 04.2020: Medtronic; Financial Interests, Personal, Full or part-time Employment, Employee since 02.2022: Medtronic; Financial Interests, Personal, Stocks/Shares: Medtronic; Financial Interests, Institutional, Invited Speaker: MSD, Bayer, Oasmia; Non-Financial Interests, Personal, Leadership Role: Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research (SAKK).

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.