Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

428P - Total neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX in patients with resectable locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer: Updated survival results

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Alexander Fedenko

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

M. Sedova1, M. Batov1, A. Kolomeytseva1, V. Khomyakov1, N. Volchenko2, A.A. Fedenko1, A. Kaprin2

Author affiliations

  • 1 P.A. Hertsen Moscow Oncology Research Institute, Moscow/RU
  • 2 P.A. Herzen Moscow Research Oncological Institute, Moscow/RU

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 428P

Background

Less than half of the patients with locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer (GC/GEJC) can tolerate all adjuvant cycles of perioperative FLOT chemotherapy. We previously reported the first results of our pilot study investigating avoidance of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC, who received 8 cycles of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX regimen followed by surgery. Here, we present updated results.

Methods

Briefly, this was a non-randomized, phase II study that enrolled 119 patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC who received either 8 cycles of total neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX regimen (prospective cohort, n = 60) or standard perioperative FLOT chemotherapy (historical control, n = 59), followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were the rate of pathological complete response (pCR) by 3 different tumor regression grading (TRG) systems and safety.

Results

The present analysis was performed at a median follow-up of 19.1 months and 24.0 months in the FOLFIRINOX and FLOT groups, respectively. Updated two-year DFS was 70.1% in FOLFIRINOX group and 65.8% in FLOT group (hazard ratio 0.73, 95% CI 0.36-1.49, p=0.384). Among the patients with diffuse type by Lauren classification a significantly higher rate of pCR was achieved following FOLFIRINOX regimen, but not in intestinal type. This was consistent across all TRG systems: pCR rate - 66.7% vs 35.0%, 69.2% vs 47.1% and 71.4% vs 39.1% by Becker, Mandard and Lavnikova systems in patients with diffuse type from FOLFIRINOX and FLOT groups, respectively. Exploratory DFS analysis did not reveal any subgroup of patients that benefited more from any administered regimen. Achieving pCR did not have an impact on DFS. FOLFIRINOX was associated with a lower incidence of peripheral neuropathy (32.2% vs. 50.6% [p=0.009]) and hepatotoxicity (27.1% vs. 50.9% [p=0.004]) compared to FLOT.

Conclusions

Total neoadjuvant chemotherapy with FOLFIRINOX regimen in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC led to a higher rate of pCR in patients with Lauren diffuse type and wasn’t inferior in terms of DFS compared to perioperative FLOT chemotherapy.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.