Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

193P - The association between FGF19 expression and clinical outcomes in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) patients (pts) receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based therapies

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Qi Cheng

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S75-S93. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1478

Authors

Q. Cheng1, T. Zhan2, H. Huang2, J. Zhan2, R. Tao2, Y. Li2, X. Chen2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Tongji Hospital affiliated to Tongji Medical College of Huazhong, Chibi City/CN
  • 2 Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan/CN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 193P

Background

Aberrant activation of FGF19-FGFR4 signaling pathway is commonly observed in HCC and correlated with poor prognosis in pts treated with Lenvatinib or Sorafenib at first-line (1L). ICI-based regimens demonstrate superior efficacy and have now become standard of care in 1L treatment of HCC. However, the relationship between FGF19 expression and prognosis in uHCC pts receiving ICI-based initial therapy remains unclear.

Methods

uHCC pts registered from 2019/1/1 to 2023/6/1 at Tongji Hospital were screened, and those who had archived tissue samples and received ICI-based initial therapy with trackable outcome were included. Clinical data were retrospectively collected, and FGF19 status was centrally assessed by IHC. Response and PFS were analyzed based on electronic medical record. Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank test were employed to compare PFS between two groups.

Results

Totally 608 pts were screened and 102 were eligible for tissue assessment. 68 pts were included in the final analysis, while 34 were excluded due to tissue quality or outcome availability. Out of 68 pts, 94.1% were male, 85.3% had HBV infection, 45.6% BCLC stage C; median age was 49y and median duration of follow-up was 16.8m. Twenty-three were positive for FGF19 (33.8%), and baseline demographics were comparable between FGF19 + and FGF19- groups. mPFS and response rate were 7.9m and 41.7% for all pts, respectively. FGF19+ pts showed significantly shorter mPFS (6.1 vs 11.4 mo; p<0.05; HR=0.45, 0.22-0.89) and a numerically lower response rate (6/18, 33.3% vs 19/42, 45.2%) compared to FGF19 pts. Table: 193P

Comparison of baseline characteristics between FGF19+ and FGF19- groups

Comparison of baseline characteristics between FGF19+ and FGF19- groups
Variables, N (%) FGF19+ (N=23) FGF19- (N=45)
Age ≥65 2 (8.7) 2 (4.4)
<65 21 (91.3) 43 (95.6)
Sex Male 22 (95.6) 42 (93.3)
Female 1 (4.4) 3 (6.7)
HBV history Yes 21 (91.3) 44 (97.8)
No 2 (8.7) 1 (2.2)
Child-Pugh score A 21 (91.3) 43 (93.3)
B 2 (8.7) 2 (6.7)
BCLC B 12 (52.2) 25 (55.6)
C 11 (47.8) 20 (44.4)

Conclusions

This is the first study that revealed the association of FGF19 expression with poor clinical outcome in HCC pts receiving ICI-based treatment, which could serve as an important tool to identify pts at increased risk and inform FGF19/FGFR4 targeted interventions, including combinations, in the treatment of FGF19+ HCC.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology.

Funding

Chen Xiao-Ping Foundation for The Development of Science and Technology of Hubei Province.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.