Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

511P - Testing patterns for microsatellite instability & mismatch repair deficiency in gastrointestinal cancers: Real-world evidence from a tertiary care cancer center

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Manaswini Kandula

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S205-S215. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1483

Authors

M.R. Kandula1, R. Pinninti2, S.J. Rajappa2, S. Kodandapani1, T.S. Rao1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, Hyderabad/IN
  • 2 Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital & Research Institute, HYDERABAD/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 511P

Background

Microsatellite instability (MSI) & mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) testing can provide both prognostic and predictive information in early as well as advanced gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. Testing patterns have evolved in recent years with the advent of tissue-agnostic approvals for immune-checkpoint-inhibitors (ICI) in MSI-High cancers.

Methods

In this retrospective observation study, we analyzed testing requests for MSI status at our hospital between Jan'20 & Dec'23. The primary objective was to describe the testing practice for MSI status (proportion of MSI-H/dMMR, GI site, clinical stage) & the secondary objective was overall survival (OS) for MSI-H GI cancers. We excluded patients with biliary tract cancer. All patients underwent immunohistochemistry (IHC) testing for lack of expression of MMR proteins on paraffin-embedded tumor tissue & when feasible additional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) based assay was also done.

Results

Two hundred and ninety-nine patients were tested for MSI in the study period. The median age of the cohort was 57 years (SD 13.0, range 22 - 86) and the majority were male (70.9%). The most common GI site was the colon (69.9%) followed by gastric (27.8%) & small intestine (1%). Two-thirds (66.6%) of the tested cohort were metastatic. All patients were tested with IHC (100%) & additional PCR panel/NGS testing was done for 17.7%. MSI-H/dMMR was 13.4% (40/299) in the entire cohort, 24% (24/100) in the early stage & 8% (16/199) in the metastatic cancers (p < 0.00). At the data cutoff, the median OS was not reached in early-stage cancers. In the metastatic cohort, the median OS was 27.1m (CI 22.4 - 31.8) and was numerically superior for the MSI-H at 35.9m (CI 23 - 48) compared to 26.8m (CI 21.8 - 31.7) in MSI- Low tumors (p - 0.38). Among all eligible MSI-H cancers, ICIs were used in only 31.2% (5/16). In metastatic cancers, the biologic/targeted therapy was used in 24.6% (49/199).

Conclusions

Our study reiterates the differential incidence of MSI-H status based on stage, with a higher proportion of early-stage GI cancers being MSI-H. Less than a third of eligible patients received ICI. Improving access to ICI can lead to better outcomes for these patients.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.