Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

354P - PARP inhibitors in pancreatic cancer with homologous recombination repair gene mutations: A single-institution experience

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Ruoyu Miao

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

R. Miao, J. Yu, K. Blue, K. Sommerer, A. Shah, S. Bottiglieri, T. Ho, K. Hicks, D. Kim

Author affiliations

  • Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa/US

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 354P

Background

Limited data are available regarding the anticancer activity of Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in pancreatic cancer with mutations in homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes other than BRCA1/2 and PALB2.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer harboring pathogenic germline or somatic mutation(s) in HRR gene(s) who were treated with PARP inhibitors at a single institution.

Results

A total of 48 patients were included. 36 patients had germline (g) HRR mutations (17 in gBRCA or gPALB2). 18 had somatic (s) HRR mutations (6 in sBRCA or sPALB2). 6 had both gHRR and sHRR mutations (4 had mutations in either gBRCA/PALB2 or sBRCA/PALB2). Objective response rate (ORR) was 22% in all 46 patients evaluable for response, 67% (4/6) in those with both gHRR and sHRR variants, 29% (4/14) with gBRCA/PALB2 mutations and 33% (1/3) with sBRCA/PALB2 mutations only. Median progression free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS) were 6.9 and 11.5 mos. Patients with both gHRR and sHRR mutations or gHRR mutations alone had significantly longer mPFS compared to those with sHRR mutations only (10.2 vs 8.3 vs 3.0 mos, P=0.025). A similar trend was seen in mOS (11.5 vs 14.0 vs 6.8 mos, P=0.101). mPFS and mOS were 6.1 and 8.6 mos in patients with gBRCA/PALB2 mutations, 12.2 and 16.2 mos with sBRCA/PALB2 mutations, 8.3 and 17.6 mos with germline non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations and 2.6 and 5.9 mos with somatic non-BRCA/non-PALB2 mutations only. 5 patients received olaparib as front line. There was no significant difference in ORR (20% vs 22%, P=1.000), mPFS (11.3 vs 6.9 mos, P=0.608) or mOS (11.3 vs 11.5 mos, P=0.629) compared to those who received a PARP inhibitor as maintenance.

Conclusions

Maintenance PARP inhibitor therapy can be considered in selected patients with advanced pancreatic cancer and non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutations. PARP inhibitor can be considered as first-line therapy for patients with borderline performance status harboring pathogenic alterations of BRCA1/2. Further studies are needed to verify our findings and identify biomarkers for better patient selection of PARP inhibitors in non-BRCA/non-PALB2 HRR mutant pancreatic cancer.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.