Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

345P - Match-pair analysis of mFOLFIRINOX vs gemcitabine+nab-paclitaxel in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: Survival and toxicity outcomes

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Arpit Jain

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S119-S161. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1481

Authors

A. Jain1, S. Soni2, K.R. Domadia3, V. Goyal4, P. Goyal4, S. Narayan5, P. Redhu1, S.S. Mathighatta Shivarudraiah1, R. Anand1, V. Talwar1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi/IN
  • 2 MGMCH - Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital, 110085 - Jaipur/IN
  • 3 HCG Cancer Centre Ahmedabad, 380054 - Ahmedabad/IN
  • 4 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, New Delhi, New Delhi/IN
  • 5 Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre, 342005 - New Delhi/IN

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 345P

Background

FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel (GN) are the most commonly used regimens in advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinomas (PDACs). Due to limited comparative data between these regimens, this study aimed to compare their efficacy and tolerability through a matched-pair analysis.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective match-pair analysis of 100 patients with metastatic or locally advanced PDAC treated with either mFOLFIRINOX or GN between August 2019 to December 2022 at a tertiary care cancer institute in India. We used age and performance status as matching factors and compared progression-free survival (PFS), response rates, and grade 3/4 adverse events between the two groups.

Results

Out of 100 matched patients (51 in modified FOLFIRINOX and 49 in GN group), the median progression free survival (PFS) was 7 months (95% CI 5.178-8.822 months) in the modified FOLFIRINOX (mFOLFIRINOX) cohort and 6.28 months (95% CI 5.703-8.88 months) in the GN group. Patient characteristics: The study included 100 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer, who received either mFOLFIRINOX or GN as first-line chemotherapy. The patients were compared based on their age, sex, comorbidities, tumour site, disease stage, and CA 19-9 levels. Response rates: The overall response rate was 39%, with GN showing a higher response rate than mFOLFIRINOX (44% vs. 32%, P=0.026). The clinical benefit rate was 73%, with no significant difference between the two regimens (78% vs. 70%, P=0.097). Adverse events: The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were neutropenia (16%), anaemia (10%), infections (13%), and peripheral neuropathy (19%). mFOLFIRINOX was associated with more non-haematological toxicities such as nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, mucositis, fatigue, and hand-foot syndrome, while GN caused more anaemia and neuropathy. Dose modifications were required in 33% of patients, more frequently in the GN group (38% vs. 26%, P=0.017).

Conclusions

In this analysis, both mFOLFIRINOX and GN had comparable survival outcomes for advanced PDAC, but mFOLFIRINOX had more non-myelosuppressive toxicities. Regimen selection should consider patient characteristics and preferences.

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.