Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session

421P - Maintenance therapy with regorafenib (REGO) versus placebo after first-line (1L) platinum and fluoropyrimidines-based chemotherapy in HER2-negative advanced gastric (GC)/gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) cancer: Results of phase II randomized a-MANTRA study

Date

27 Jun 2024

Session

Poster Display session

Presenters

Carmine Pinto

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2024) 35 (suppl_1): S162-S204. 10.1016/annonc/annonc1482

Authors

A. Damato1, D. Bilancia2, F. Iachetta1, A. Strippoli3, F. Filiali4, R. Casaretti5, I. Bernardini6, G. Bellotti7, G.L. Frassineti8, F. Di Fabio9, M. Aieta10, M. Ghidini11, C. Trentin12, G. Cardellino13, E. Gervasi14, A. Romagnani15, S. Cinieri16, N. Normanno5, L. Boni17, C. Pinto1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Azienda Ospedaliera - Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia/IT
  • 2 AZ. OSPEDALIERA SAN CARLO, Potenza/IT
  • 3 Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Rome/IT
  • 4 Vimercate Hospital, ASST della Brianza, Vimercate/IT
  • 5 Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS - Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli/IT
  • 6 Ospedale Ramazzini, Carpi/IT
  • 7 Oncology Unit, Azienda Ospedaliera "SS Antonio e Biagio e Cesare Arrigo”, Alessandria, Alessandria/IT
  • 8 IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) “Dino Amadori”, Meldola/IT
  • 9 AOU Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna/IT
  • 10 Oncology Unit, IRCCS CROB, Rionero in Vulture, 85020 - Rionero in Vulture/IT
  • 11 Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan/IT
  • 12 Ospedale Santa Chiara - APSS, Trento/IT
  • 13 Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, Udine/IT
  • 14 Medical Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Azienda USL - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia/IT
  • 15 IRCCS- AUSL Reggio Emilia, Guastalla/IT
  • 16 Ospedale A. Perrino, Brindisi/IT
  • 17 IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova/IT

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 421P

Background

To date, there is no established role for maintenance therapy following 1L chemotherapy for GC. The a-MANTRA study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of REGO as maintenance after 1L therapy in advanced GC/GEJ tumors.

Methods

This is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter phase II study in which HER2 neg GC/GEJ pts treated with platinum and fluoropyrimidines 1L therapy and disease control were randomized (1:1) to maintenance placebo (ARM A) or REGO (ARM B) starting at 80 mg up to 160 mg (once daily, d1-21, q28 days). The primary endpoint was median PFS1. Two-sided 80% CIs were planned for HR=0.57, one-sided α=0.10 (90% power), corresponding to 3-month increase in mPFS1. 118 subjects were needed to observe 88 events. The interim analysis (IA) was intended after 44 events.

Results

67 pts were randomized in 18 Italian Cancer Centers of which 64 (33 in ARM A, 31 in ARM B) received treatment. Most of pts were male (64.1%), Caucasian (96.8%), ECOG PS 0 (81.2%); median age was 66 (40-80) yrs. The main primary tumor side was proximal (64.1%) with intestinal subtype (54.7%), and peritoneum spread in 42.2%. IA revealed a 98% probability of achieving a significant result for mPFS1. The study was early halted due to introduction of anti-PD1 in 1L. The responses to 1L were PR (50.0%), CR (7.8%), and SD (42.2%). At a median 31-month (mth) follow-up (IQR 19.1-33-8), 28 (84.8%) and 26 (83.8%) events were reported. The main reason for discontinuation was PD (66.7% and 35.5%). mPFS1 was 3.91 (80% CI, 2.27-5.98) and 5.19 mth (80% CI, 4.0-7.26) [HR= 0.736 (80%CI, 0.51-1.04; p=0.1318)]. mOS was 11.25 and 16.97 mth (95%CI, HR=0.596 [0.318-1.103], p=0.1003). The most common G3-4 AEs for each arm were fatigue (3.0 vs 6.4%), thrombocytopenia (3.0 vs 3.2%), hand-foot syndrome (0 vs 12.9%).

Conclusions

Despite the favorable trend, since the sample was not sized for the statistical assumption, REGO as maintenance after 1L therapy did not reach statistically significant effects in mPFS1. No safety concerns were raised. Novel study proposals succeeding REGO with immunotherapy are needed.

Clinical trial identification

NCT03627728.

Legal entity responsible for the study

GOIRC.

Funding

Bayer.

Disclosure

A. Damato: Financial Interests, Institutional, Advisory Board: Daiichi Sankyo, Merck Serono. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.